This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation of companies-Fact intimated to Income-tax authorities-Notice in name of transferor company which had ceased to exist-Not valid.[S. 147, Art. 226]
Briliant Credit and Finance Ltd. (formerly known as Akarshan Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 774 (Cal)(HC)
S. 148 :Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued after approval of resolution plan under IBC Code, 2016-Not valid.[S. 147, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S.7, 31, Art. 226
Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 165 taxmann.com 641 / (2025) 482 ITR 264 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Faceless assessment-Ex-parte order-Violation of principles of natural justice-Order set aside and matter remanded for consideration afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing.[S. 144B, 148, Art. 226]
M.G. Constructions Pvt. Ltd v. NFAC (2025) 482 ITR 949 (All)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Procedure laid down in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO (2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC)-Assessing Officer bound to dispose of objections of assessee by speaking order prior to reassessment order-Notices and reassessment order set aside.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 482 ITR 916 (Karn)(HC)
S. 147 :Reassessment-Notice-Review of judgment-Disputing deposit of cash in bank account forming ground for reassessment notice-Notice valid.[S. 148, Art.226]
Ramakant v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 910 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Sufficiency of reasons cannot be considered at the stage of notice-Notice based on information from the Income-tax Investigation Wing is valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Akshat Pramodkumar Chaudhary v. Dy. CIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 25 /(2025) 482 ITR 860 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147:Reassessment-Capital gains-Considered in the original assessment proceedings-Notice based on the same facts-Not valid.[S. 45, 54EC, 148, Art. 226]
Bimlakumari Lajpatraj Hurra v. ITO [2023] 152 taxmann.com 254 / (2025) 482 ITR 741 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-No new information-Notice based on facts already on record-Notice not valid.[S. 148, 260A]
PCIT v. Alcatel Lucent India Ltd [2023] 152 taxmann.com 48 / (2025) 482 ITR 733 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Accommodation entry-Cash credits-Same material-Second notice-No fresh material-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection was quashed. [S. 68, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]
PMC Fincorp Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 158 taxmann.com 533 / (2025) 482 ITR 444 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Order passed without considering objections of assessee-Not valid-Order and notice quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Browntape Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 789 (Bom) (Gao)(HC)