S. 37(1): Business expenditure –Capital or revenue-Advantage for enduring benefit-Non-compete fee –No monopoly achieved-Allowable as revenue expenditure.
Sharp Business System (Through Finance Director Mr. Yoshihisa Mizuno) v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 509 /308 Taxman 285 /348 CTR 1 / 257 DTR 49 (SC) Dy.CIT v. Pentamedia Graphics Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 /308 Taxman 285 /348 CTR 1 / 257 DTR 49 (SC) PCIT v. Piramal Glass Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 /308 Taxman 285 /348 CTR 1 / 257 DTR 49 (SC) CIT v. Penatsoft Technolgies Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 /308 Taxman 285 /348 CTR 1 / 257 DTR 49 (SC) Editorial : Sharp Business System v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 496 (Delhi) (HC) / Sharp Business System v. CIT [2012] 254 CTR 233/211 Taxman 576 (Delhi (HC) set aside. The court remanded the remaining appeals to the repective Tribunals to be heard afresh, having regard to the ratio laid down as per para 32 of the Judgement.