S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital receipt-Government subsidy-Subsidy received for capital purposes is not taxable as a revenue receipt. [S.28(i)]
Capgemini India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 431 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital receipt-Government subsidy-Subsidy received for capital purposes is not taxable as a revenue receipt. [S.28(i)]
Capgemini India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 431 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Furnishing inaccurate particulars of income-Penalty based on disallowance of payment treated as Fees for Technical Services-Quantum addition deleted-Penalty deleted.
AVTEC Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 692 / (2025) 129 ITR 483 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reassessment-Scope of revision confined to issues arising from reassessment-Commissioner cannot direct enquiry into matters outside reasons recorded for reopening. [S. 147, 148]
Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 63 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional grounds-Pure question of law arising from record-Additional grounds admissible.
Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 229 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional ground-Pure question of law requiring no fresh investigation of facts-Admitted.[S.10AA, 139]
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 234B: : Interest-Advance tax-Levy of interest-Mandatory and consequential.[S. 234C]
Toyota Kirloskar Motor P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 515 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 199: Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Return held non est-Assessment-Assessing Officer bound to grant credit of taxes and consequential refund.[S.139(9),143(3), 237]
Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 94 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 195: Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Fees for Included Services-Pre-clinical laboratory services-No “make available” of technical knowledge-Receipts not taxable in India-No obligation to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-USA.[S.9(1)(vii), 90(2) Art. 12]
Charles River Laboratories Inc. v. Asst. CIT [2023] 152 taxmann.com 568 / (2025) 129 ITR 754 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 194C: Deduction of tax at source-Contractors-Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges-Charges paid to independent service providers-Not part of rent-Tax deductible under section 194C at 2 per cent and not under section 194-I. [S. 194-I, 201(1), 201(1A)]
Chadha Sugars and Industries P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 535 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 153A: Assessment-Search and seizure-No incriminating material-Difference between physical stock and book stock by itself cannot constitute incriminating material-Addition based only on sworn statement without corroborative evidence-Assessment quashed-Delay of three days was condoned.[S. 37, 132, 143(3), 253]
Dy. CIT v. WD and Sons P. Ltd. (2025) 129 ITR 278 (Chennai) (Trib.)