This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Diamond industry-Practical difficulties in furnishing segment-wise details of AE segment and non-AE segment-Penalty not leviable. [S. 92D(3)]

DCIT v. Dharmanandan Diamonds (P) Ltd. (2022) 195 ITD 717 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Mortgaged property-Auctioned by bank-Capital gains not shown-Guarantor-Difference view-Levy of penalty is not valid-Appeal admitted-Penalty cannot be deleted automatically. [S. 2(47) 45, 48, 260A]

Ajaybhai I Gogia v. ITO (2022) 195 ITD 301 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 268A : Appeal-CBDT Circular-Tax effect from Rs 20 lakhs to Rs 50 lakhs-Enhancing limit-Applies appeals pending before ITAT.

ACIT v. Northern Motors (P.) Ltd. (2022) 195 ITD 207/ 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar)(Trib.) ACIT v. Acme Forgings (2022) 195 ITD 207/ 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar) (Trib.) ACIT v. Ashok Kumar Uppal (Dr.) (2022) 195 ITD 207 / 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Book profit-New method of accounting-Forex gain or losses-No enquires made by the AO in the assessment proceedings-Revision is held to be valid. [S. 115JB]

TAQA Neyveli Power Company (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 195 ITD 775 / 220 TTJ 1114 / (2023) 221 DTR 289 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Club entrance fee-Capital receipt-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 4, 143(3)]

Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 195 ITD 373 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Managing Director or Director-Appeal signed by General-Not having valid power of Attorney-Appeal was dismissed in limine [S. 140 (c) Rules, 45, 47]

Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 195 ITD 188 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal- – Private company — Recovery of tax — Name struck down from ROC under section 248 of Companies Act, 2013 Arrears of income-tax due — Appeal to Tribunal does not become infructuous – Name struck down from ROC under section 248 of Companies Act, 2013-Appeal is maintainable. [S. . 68, 179 ,248, 250, Companies Act , 2013 , S.248 , 250 ]]

Dwarka Portfolio (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 195 ITD 491 / 99 ITR 620 (Delhi)(Trib.)/Shastri Buildcon P.Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 99 ITR 620 ( Delhi ) ( Trib) Vavasi Telegence P .Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 99 ITR 620 ( Delhi ) ( Trib)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-Penalty under section 270A-Appealable before CIT(A) and Not before Appellate Tribunal.[S.246A(1)(q), 253 (1)(a),275]

Desmond Savio Theodore Fernandes v. ITO (2022) 195 ITD 352 / 217 TTJ 84 (UO) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Income offered-Payer has deducted tax at source in financial year 2018-19-Credit for tax deducted at source has to be given in the year in which the income was offered for taxation. [S. 4, 198, Rule 37BA]

Shivganga Drillers (P.) Ltd. v. CPC, Income-tax, Bangalore (2022) 195 ITD 555 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Purchase of property without deduction of tax at source-Proviso to section 201(1)-Non-resident disclosed consideration in his return-Not to be treated as assessee in default-Payees filed their return of income disclosing said amount to a tax on 30-7-2012, interest amount levied upon assessee under section 201(1A) should be calculated for the period from 7-10-2011 to 30-7-2012 till the date of filing of return by payees. [S. 201(1), 201(IA)]

Shree Balaji Concepts v. JT. CIT (2022) 195 ITD 632 (Panaji) (Trib.)