This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions-Sanction-Chief Commissioner-Commissioner-Compounding of offences —CBDT Circular issued in 2019-Assessee over 70 years-Discretion to compound offences-Paid tax, penalty and interest-Directed to consider the application for compounding the offence. [S. 119(1), 271(1)(c), 273A, 276C, 277, 279(2), Art. 226]

K. M. Mammen v. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 266 /215 DTR 37 / 139 taxmann.com 57 / 327 CTR 170(Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Rejection of application for compounding of offences-Contempt proceedings-Directions Issued by Court in contempt petition-Court cannot issue directions traversing beyond its scope of jurisdiction-Liberty was granted to the assessee to file a fresh application for compounding of offences and put forth all his contentions. [S. 277, 279, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, S. 11, 12, Art. 226]

D. C. Patwari v. K. M. Mammen (2022) 445 ITR 254/ 215 DTR 25 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial: Decision of the single judge in K. M. Mammen v. D. C. Patwari (2022) 445 ITR 234 / 215 DTR 25/ 327 CTR 158 (Mad.)(HC) affirmed.

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax Power of High Court to try offences committed-Direction to consider application for compounding of offence-Rejection of application for compounding of offence based on circular issued by Central-Contempt petition was dismissed-Directed to consider the application for compounding of offence according to new circular and provisions of section 279(1A of the Act. [S. 277, 279(IA), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482, Art. 215, 226, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, S. 11, Art. 226]

K. M. Mammen v. D.C. Patwari, IRS (2022) 445 ITR 234 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial: Affirmed by Division Bench, D. C. Patwari, IRS v. K. M. Mammen (2022) 445 ITR 254 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Limitation for filing Criminal Complaint-Concealment of income in Foreign Bank-Economic offence-No limitation prescribed-Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation Act) Act, 1974-Evidentiary value of documents —Authenticity of documents would be decided by Trial Court-Powers of High Court-No power to review or alter order once signed-Clarification seeking dispensation with appearance of assessee in Trial Court-Assessee to seek remedy before Trial Court. [S. 131, 148, to quash 250(6) 273A, 276(1), 277,279(1A), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 205, 362, 482 Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation Act, 1974, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 78(6)]

K. M. Mammen v. Dy. CIT (2022)445 ITR 220 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Company-Principal Officer-Notice must be served on Principal Officer of company —Notice held to be not valid-Order of Trial Court set aside. [S. 2(35), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.S. 245]

Income-Tax Department v. Jenious Clothing Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 445 ITR 210/ 212 DTR 196/ 326 CTR 356 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Presumption of culpable mental state-Delay in paying self assessment tax-Tax and interest paid before filing of complaint-Launching of prosecution malicious and in valid. [S. 140A, 276(2), 278E]

Noorjahan (Mrs.) v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 /287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC) AMK Solutions Private Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17// 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 / 287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Presumption of culpable mental state-Delay in paying self assessment tax-Tax and interest paid before filing of complaint-Launching of prosecution malicious and in valid. [S. 140A, 276(2), 278E]

Noorjahan (Mrs.) v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 /287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC) AMK Solutions Private Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 / 287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Charitable trust-Denial of exemption-Show cause notice for issue of concealment penalty-Alternative remedy-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 11, 12, 12A, 274, Art. 226]

Aurolab Trust v. NFAC (2022) 445 ITR 645 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Abatement of proceedings-Settlement of Dispute-Revision proceedings initiated abate-Revision held to be not valid. [Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, Art. 226]

Gopalakrishnan Rajkumar v. PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 577/ 214 DTR 235 /330 CTR 659(Mad.)(HC) Gopalakrishnan Ravim v. PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 577/ 214 DTR 235/330 CTR 659 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Jurisdiction of Tribunal confined to subject matter of appeal-Question before Tribunal regarding extent of deduction-Tribunal does not have power to disallow entire deduction. [S. 36(1)(iii), 57(iii)]

West Palm Developments LLP v. ACIT (2022) 445 ITR 511 (Karn.)(HC)