This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Appeal filed manually-Dismissal of appeal-Appellate authority is directed to take into consideration the date of filing of the manual appeal for the purposes of calculating and appreciating the issue of delay in respect of the appeal preferred online. [S. 250, Art.226]

Electron Volt Renewables (P) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 168 taxmann.com 378 / (2025) 342 CTR 357 / 245 DTR 134 (AP)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Directed to refund the amount with interest.[R. 31A,Form No 26B, Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, S. 5, 6, 7, Art. 226]

Dish TV India Ltd. v CIT (2025) 342 CTR 430 / 245 DTR 438 (All) (HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Delay in payment—Laxity of Department—Strictures-Refund of tax amount if any, ought to be immediately granted to assessee-Delayed payment of refunds burdens the public exchequer-Rules would be required to be framed-Accountability is required to be fixed. [S. 239, 244A, Art. 226]

Bloomberg Data Services (India) (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 342 CTR 249 / 245 DTR 9 / 302 Taxman 454 (Bom)(HC)

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed income-Evidence collected and noticed during the search can be considered for assessment-Cross examination of parties-Ghost of benami companies-Assessment order is correctly assessed-No substantial question of law.[S. 158BB, 260A]

CIT v Mange Ram Mittal [2024] 168 taxmann.com 306/ (2025) 482 ITR 130 / 342 CTR 1 / 245 DTR 49 (P&H)(HC) Editorial : Mange Ram Mittal v. ACIT (2006) 103 TTJ 594(SB) (Delhi) (Trib) is affirmed.

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Assessee has accepted the disallowance-Issue is not debatable-Order of Tribunal affirming the order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 14A, 260A]

Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. v CIT (2025) 342 CTR 697 / 245 DTR 347 / 302 Taxman 397 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Limitation-Search in the case of husband-Seized materials which belonged to assessee were handed over to jurisdictional Assessing Officer on 20-11-2021-Assessment orders were issued on 30-3-2023 or 31-3-2023-Time limit of 12 months would run from 31-3-2022 to 31-3-2023-Assessment orders were issued within period of limitation-Issuance of notice under section 153A is triggered by search or requisition, whereas notice under section 153C is triggered only upon occurrence of three conditions-Provision of Section 69 is applicable in case of where the books of account is not maintained-Opportunity of being heard-The order under S. 127 was issued after obtaining the consent of or consulting the persons concerned. Mixed questions of fact and law cannot be decided in the absence of pleadings. [S.69, 132(9A), 153B, Art. 226]

Pavithra Sugichandran (Smt.) v DCIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 413 / (2025) 342 CTR 514 245 DTR 401 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice issued by jurisdictional AO and not as per S. 151A— Section 144B cannot be viewed as exclusive basis for all assessment and reassessment procedures and Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) cannot be completely deprived of power to assess or reassess merely because section 144B and Faceless Reassessment Scheme 2022 have been introduced S.151A-Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Guidelines issued in terms of sub-S. (2) of s. 144B will not amount to the directions issued by the Central Government in terms of sub(2) of s. 151A—Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 124 143(2), 144B,148, 148A]

Mark Studio India (P) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 169 taxmann.com 542 / (2025) 342 CTR 361 / 245 DTR 273 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Final assessment order passed by AO is quashed only for the purpose of enabling the assessee to take up all objections and contentions vis-a-vis the impugned notices-On SLP the Court held that the concerned AO shall consider the objections and contentions of the assessee. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

Seahorse Mercantile Co. (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 172 taxmann.com 163/ 342 CTR 238 (SC) Editorial : Seahorse Mercantile Co. (P) Ltd. v. ITO(2025) 172 taxmann.com 62 (Bom)(HC) is set side.

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice in the name of dead person-High Court by an order disposed of writ petition reserving all contentions to be taken by legal heirs of assessee before Assessing Officer except contention that initial notice under section 148A(b) was issued to a dead person-Order of High Court is modified and the AO is directed to consider all legal arguments including defect notice issued in the name of dead person. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

Ghanyashyam Anil Dhanani v. ITO (2025) 342 CTR 232 / 245 DTR 35 /302 Taxman 411 (SC) Editorial : Ghanyashyam Anil Dhanani v. ITO (2024) 169 taxmmann.com 326 (Bom)(HC)

S.148:Reassessment—Deceased-Insolvency proceedings— Once the assets were taken over by the Official Assignee and the assessee was declared as an insolvent, the respondents can very well approach the Official Assignee for seeking their remedy—It is upto the Official Assignee to consider the claims and distribute the proceeds in accordance with law. [S. 147,152(2), 226(3), 263, Art. 226]

A. Sai Siva Jyothi v. PCIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 19/(2025) 342 CTR 114 / 245 DTR 82 (Mad)(HC)