This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147: Reassessment – With in four years- Change of opinion – No fresh tangible material – Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 35AC, 80G, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Lupin Limited v. Dy CIT 3(4) (Bom)(HC). www.itatonline.org

S. 250 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Procedure – Stay of demand – Refund adjustment – Delay in disposal of stay application – Strictures – The delay of six years in deciding the stay application is unjustified and that respondents cannot take advantage of their own delay- The Court directed the revenue to refund the amount within four weeks and suggested that the petitioner apply for an early hearing before CIT(A) – The court further directed CIT(A) to dispose of the appeal before 31 May 2025 and ordered Chief Commissioner of Income -tax to investigate the delay in disposing of the appeal pending since 2018- Writ petition is allowed . [S. 143(1),143(3), 225, 226, 245, 250(6A), Art. 226]

Mahesh Mathuradas Ganatra v. CPC (Bom)(HC)www.itatonline .org

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice -Income from other sources – Failure to respond to notice – Audit objection after amendment – Factual disputes can not be adjudicated in writ proceedings when an alternative remedy is available- Writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file an appeal. [S. 57, 142(1), 143(3), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Sanjay Patel v. ACIT(Bom) (HC) www.itatonline .org

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Development agreement – Cost Inflation Index – Year of taxability – Tribunal’s common order applied to all co-owners – Miscellaneous application of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 45 , 48 , 254(1)]

ACIT v. Neelam Omprakash Singh (Mum)( Trib)www.itatonlline .org

S. 148: Reassessment – Income of any other person – Search – Search material pertains to third party – Notice of reassessment under Section 148 is held without jurisdiction – Section 153C and not section 148 is to be resorted to- Notice of reassessment is quashed and set aside . [S. 132, 147, 151(1), 153A, 153C, Art. 226]

Sejal Jewellery & others v. UOI .(Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Credit for tax deducted at source-Double taxation agreement-Refund interest-Respondents are directed to refund the amount along with statutory interest forthwith. [S. 90, 155(14), 199, Form No 266AS, Art. 226]

Munchener Ruckversicherungs Gesellshaft Aktiengesellschaft In Munchen v.CIT (IT) (2024) 341 CTR 941 / 8 NYPCTR 1232 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional evidence-No application was moved-Failure to produce will during assessment proceedings-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[R.46A, 260A. Order 41, Rule, 27CPC]

Rajiv Mehra v. CIT (2024) 168 taxmann.com 273 /341 CTR 329 / 243 DTR 161 / 8 NYPCTR 1424 (P&H) (HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Conditions-Full and true disclosure-Revision of application-No full and true disclosure-Order of Settlement Commission is set aside.[S.245C, 245D (4),245H, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Pankaj Buildwell Ltd. & Group (2024) 161 taxmann.com 605/ 341 CTR 127 / 8 NYPCTR 457 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 234A : Interest-Default in furnishing return of income-Marginal delay in filing of return-Interest u/s 234A is waived-Advance tax-Deferment of advance tax-Waiver or reduction-Board’s F. No. 400/129/2002-IT(B), dt. 26th June, 2006-CBDT Circular, does not specifically deal with waiver of interest under S.. 234B and 234C-Does not specifically deal with waiver of interest-No impediments operating against the assessee from paying the advance tax within the time line under S. 211. [S. 119, 211, 234B, 234C, Art. 226]

Chandrasekarapuram Co-Operative Whole Sale Stores Ltd. v. CCIT (2024) 161 taxmann.com 807 / 341 CTR 575 / 242 DTR 554 / 8 NYPCTR 541 (Mad)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Stay-Direction to pay 15 per cent of total demand.[S. 250, Art. 226]

Diana Gomez v. CIT (A) (2024) 341 CTR 583 / 241 DTR 47 / 8 NYPCTR 429 (Ker) (HC) Editorial : Diana Gomez v. CIT (A) (2024) 341 CTR 581 /241 DTR 45 / 8 NYPCTR 428 (Ker)(HC), order is modified.