This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Purchase of land-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside.[S.69C, 147, 153A, Art. 226]
Shashikiran Janardhan Shetty v. ACIT (2023)153 taxmann.com 472 / (2024) 471 ITR 528 (Bom) (HC)
145 : Method of accounting-Wastage-Suppression of weight or production-Addition is made on presumptions and assumptions-Addition affirmed by the Tribunal is deleted-Scarp value of discarded cables-Addition is deleted.[S. 41(2), 256(2)]
Shree Digvijaya Woollen Mills Ltd. v.CIT (2024)471 ITR 655 (P&H) (HC)
S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Remand proceedings-Assessment order passed without passing a draft assessment is not tenable-Limitation period is expired. [S.92C, 153(3), 154(4), 260]
PCIT v. Sumitomo Corporation India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 471 ITR 688 /166 taxmann.com 55 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Inability to participate in video conference-Natural justice-No fault of the assessee-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking order after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [S. 143(3), 144, Art. 226]
Anuj Bakshi v. ACIT (2024)471 ITR 446 (Cal) (HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Cash credits-Un secured loan-No opportunity of cross examination is provided-Assessment order is set aside. [S. 68, 133(6) Art, 226]
MAA Padmavati Exports v. ITO (2024) 471 ITR 683/ 163 taxmann.com 605 (Guj) (HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-Notice is sent to wrong email-Order is set a side-The Assessing Officer is directed to pass an order after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [S. 156, Art. 226]
Jyoti Narang v. ITO (2024) 471 ITR 66 (Delhi)(HC).
S. 143(3): Assessment-Capital gains-Penny stock-Shyam transactions-Statement of third parties used against the assessee-No opportunity of cross examination is given-Assessment order is set aside and matter remanded for reconsideration.[S. 10(38) 45, 112A, Art. 226]
Naresh Sangeetha v. ITO (2024)471 ITR 515 (Mad) (HC)
S. 143(3): Assessment-r Principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving an opportunity of hearing is set aside.[S. 142(1), Art.226]
Kulumepalya Lenkegowda Shivakumar v. ITO (2024)471 ITR 459 (Karn) (HC)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Corporate insolvency resolution plan was approved by National Company Law Tribunal on 14-10-2022 which provided that no person shall be entitled to initiate any proceedings against assessee in relation to claims so long such result to a period prior to effective date of resolution plan, i.e., 10-11-2022-Notice issued under section 143(2) to assessee for A.Y. 2022-23 is bad in law and quashed. [S. 142, 143(2), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 14, Art. 226]]
AMNS Khopoli Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 471 ITR 571/ 164 taxmann.com 187 (Bom) (HC)
S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Fees for technical services-Insertion of explanation to Section 9 By Finance Act, 2010 with effect from 1-6-1976-No disallowance can be made-Interpretation-General principles-Principles of lex non cogit ad impossibilla, and impotentia excust legem.[S.9(1)(vii), 195, 260A
ACIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 471 ITR 273 (Bom) (HC)