This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Deduction and not exemption-Set off of losses-Loss from export oriented undertakings-Can be set off against other business income-Payment of management fees-Transfer pricing adjustment-Closing stock addition-Provision for absolute inventory-Valuation of stock on scientific basis-Question of fact. [S. 70, 71, , 92C,260A]
PCIT v. Sandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd. (2022)449 ITR 312/ 289 Taxman 342 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Loss of source of income-The amount received under the deed for restrictive covenant as a capital receipt not liable to tax. [S. 7(1)(iv), 17(3)(i), 28(va), Art. 226]
Neville Tuli v. ITO (2022) 213 DTR 1 / 326 CTR 432 (Bom.)(HC) Neville Tuli v. ITAT (2022) 213 DTR 1 / 326 CTR 432 (Bom.)(HC)
Wealth-Tax Act , 1957
S. 2(ea):Asset -Stock in trade – Urban land – Net wealth – Special Township and Tourism Project – Stock in trade – Not liable to wealth -tax – The aggregate value of debt owed by Respondent in respect of assets owned by Respondent have to be reduced from the aggregate value of asset belonging to Respondent. [S. 2(e)(a)(v), 2(m), Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, S. 63-IA(1) ]
PCWT v. Valuable Properties Pvt Ltd ( 2022) 220 ITR 298 / (2023) 331 CTR 81 ( Bom)( HC )
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 – Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019- Amnesty Scheme .
Clause 126: Verification by designated committee – Failure to deposit the tax with in stipulated time – Rejection of application is held to be justified [ Clause, 127, 129, Art . 226 ]
National Construction Company v. The Designated Committee under Sabka Vishwas Legacy Disputes Resolution Scheme, 2019( 2022) 326 CTR 799/ 213 DTR 423 ( Bom)( HC)
S. 145 : Method of accounting – Estimation of income – Discrepancy in receipt shown in 26AS – Merely on the basis of difference addition cannot be made [ S. 68, 133(6) , Form No 26AS ]
Shri Jeen Mata Buildcon ( P) Ltd v. ITO ( 2022) 197 ITD 256/ 97 ITR 756 ( Jaipur ) (Trib)
S. 80IB: Industrial undertakings – Form No 10CCB was uploaded on receipt of intimation – Assessing Officer is directed to allow the rectification applied by the assessee and allow the claim. [ S. 143(1), 154 ]
Satish Cold Storage v. Dy.CIT ( 2022) 197 ITD 41 / 97 ITR 601 (Luck. )( Trib)
S. 260A : Appeal – High Court -Territorial jurisdiction —The High Court having jurisdiction over the Assessing Officer who passed assessment order – Appeals against orders of Appellate Tribunal lie before High Court within whose jurisdiction assessing officer who passed assessment order situated. [ 116, 120, 124, 127, 252, 255, 260A, 269]
CIT v. Balak Capital Pvt. Ltd (2022) 449 ITR 394 / 220 DTR 303 /(2023 ) 330 ITR 111 / 291 Taxman 198( SC) MANU/SCOR/114426/2022( SC) MANU/SCOR/114426/2022 Editorial: Decision in CIT v. Balak Capital Pvt. Ltd ( 2017) 391 ITR 112 ( P& H)( HC), affirmed.
S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay – Leave travel concession — Estimate of income – Assessee in default Public sector Bank — Employees travelling not only to domestic destination but to foreign countries – Not taking shortest possible route — Employees not entitled to exemption — Leave travel concession reimbursed without deduction of tax at source —Assessee could not claim ignorance about travel plans of employees- Complete facts available- Not a bona fide mistake-Liable to pay interest . [ S. 10(5), 192(1) ,201(1), ITR . 2B]
State Bank of India v . CIT (2022)449 ITR 192 / 329 CTR 449 / 144 taxmann.com 131 (SC) Editorial : State Bank of India v CIT (ITA No. 5 of 2020 dt 13 -1 -2020( Delhi)( HC ) , affirmed .
S. 139 : Return of Income – Income tax returns do not necessarily furnish an accurate guide of the real income- Particularly, when parties are engaged in a matrimonial conflict- High Court was not justified in setting aside the order of the Family Court . [ Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 , S. 125 ]
Kiran Tomar & Ors v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) SCC Online SC 539
S. 220 : Collection and recovery – Assessee deemed in default – Interest mandatory — Delay in payment of tax — Waiver — No genuine hardship- Raising dispute before Authority not ground for waiver of interest — Dispute pending resolved under mutual agreement procedure – Order of Commissioner refusing to waive interest is justified. [ S. 220(2), 220(2A) ]
Pioneer Overseas Corporation USA (India Branch) v. CIT(IT) (2022)449 ITR 186 / 329 CTR 686 / 220 DTR 39 / 145 taxmann.com 475/(2023) 290 Taxman 375 (SC) Editorial: Decision affirmed , Pioneer Overseas Corporation USA (India Branch) v. CIT(IT) ( 2017) 248 Taxman 186 ( Delhi)( HC)