S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-CIT(A) estimated at 25 percent-Tribunal restricted the addition to 12.5 percent.
Anil Arora v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 56 (SMC)(SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-CIT(A) estimated at 25 percent-Tribunal restricted the addition to 12.5 percent.
Anil Arora v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 56 (SMC)(SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Deposit of cash in bank account-Addition was deleted-Cash deposits and withdrawal-Concealment penalty-Matter remanded. [S. 271(1)(c)]
Sudhir Angre v. ITO (2022)93 ITR 69 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.) Sunil Angre v. ITO (2022)93 ITR 69 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)S. 69 : Income from undisclosed sources-Entries in cash book on date of issue of cheque-Presented in Bank subsequently-Matter remanded for verification.
Niyant Heritage Hotels (P.) Ltd. v ITO (2022) 93 ITR 11 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 69 : Income from undisclosed sources-Entries in cash book on date of issue of cheque-Presented in Bank subsequently-Matter remanded for verification.
Niyant Heritage Hotels (P.) Ltd. v ITO (2022)93 ITR 11 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Entire deposit cannot be added as income of the assessee-Estimating the commission at 0.6 percent is held to be appropriate.
ITO v. Rakesh Relan (2022) 93 ITR 39 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase of immovable property for value less than stamp duty value-Amendment is applicable for assessment year 2014-15 and subsequent years-Amendment is not retrospective-Unable to explain the source of cash payment-Assessable as income undisclosed income. [S. 56 (2)(vii)(b), 69].
Balaram Suryavanshi v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 4 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 40(a)(ia) : Payment For Pest Control after deduction of tax at source-No disallowance can be made-Building maintenance-Matter remanded. [S. 194C]
Niyant Heritage Hotels (P.) Ltd. v ITO (2022) 93 ITR 11 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Agent of Life Insurance Corporation-Expenses related to salary, staff welfare and bonus-Disallowance on guess work is held to be not valid.
Rajiv Gupta v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 3 (SN) (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Construction of new roads-Capital expenditure-Share premium-Interest on borrowed capital-Matter remanded. [S. 36(1)(iii), 68]
Pragati Glass Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 93 ITR 42 (SN) (Surat)(Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Increased liability on account of wage revision due to Court order-Entries in books of account not determinative-Right to claim legitimate deduction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 139(5), 145]
ITO v. Karnataka State Industrial Co-Operative Bank Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 50 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)