Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue, the Court held that the Tribunal is justified in allowing the provision for warranty and liquidated damages as allowable expenditure. Leave travel allowance as per rule and consistency practice allowable deduction. Provision of 43B(f) is not applicable. (AY, 2007-08, 2011-12, 2012-13)
PCIT v. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. (2024) 471 ITR 481 (Jharkhand) (HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for warranty-Under contract of sale-Liquidated damages-Allowable as expenditure-Leave travel allowance as per rule and consistency practice-Allowable deduction-Provision of 43B(f) is not applicable. [S.10(15), 43B(f), 260A,]
Leave a Reply