Tribunal held that Commissioner’s revisional order required the Assessing Officer to examine certain aspects arising out of the return. He could not have travelled beyond such assessment and therefore, his action of making addition of Rs.2-02 crores towards the entrance fee receipts was beyond the scope of revisional order. On appeal by the revenue , dismissing the appeal the Court held that ,when the Commissioner requires the Assessing Officer to carry out inquiries with respect to specific issues , the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to pass fresh order must be confined to such issues only , failing which we would be giving the power to the Assessing Officer to make reassessment .( ITA NO 1127of 2016 , 1276 of 2016 dt 29 -1-2019 ) ( From the judgement of the Tribunal in ITA No . 1654 /2012 dt 22-07 -2015 ( AY. 2005 -06)
PCIT v. Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. ( 2019) 175 DTR 285 / 308 CTR 38/ 103 taxmann.com 13 (Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed on account of low tax effect ,PCIT v. Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd ( 2020) 268 Taxman 389 (SC)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Jurisdiction-When the Commissioner requires the Assessing Officer to carry out inquiries with respect to specific issues, the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to pass fresh order must be confined to such issues only. [S. 263]