Court held that , Objection taken to SMS from Dept Advocate that what Court is “pressurising me to do is both wrong and unethical. No Advocate of any worth would stoop so low. Sorry I am not able to comply with this rather unusual demand”. The SMS is contrary to the statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General. The SMS either stems from not understanding our view or it is a made up indignation so as to accuse of us of pressurizing him to do an activity not expected of an Advocate. It appears to be in the second category as the SMS appears to give a completely different twist to the facts as stated to him by Associate. Copy of order sent to CBDT Chairman. ( ITA No. 130 of 2016, dt.02.08.2018) (AY. 2009 -10, 2010-11)
[Click here to download PDF file]http://itatonline.org/archives/wp-content/uploads/Starflex-Sealing-Strictures.pdf