Question And Answer
Subject: Invalid IDS- declaration and assessment u/sec.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act.
Category: 
Querist: Prakash Kulkarni
Answered by:
Tags: , , ,
Date: August 9, 2022
Query asked by Prakash Kulkarni

Assessee firm has made declaration under IDS for A.Y.2015-16 amounting to Rs. 3.30 cr. and has paid the installment of tax due on 30.11.2016, 30.03.2017 and 30.09.2017 , however due to mistake of CA , there was shortfall of Rs. 1313000/-, which he has paid on 3.10.2017.

The assessee thought he had made the compliance of IDS. since the all the mail id of CA was given , assessee was not aware of  the shortfall and proceedings completed by the AO U/Sec.147 r.w.s.144 r.w.s 144B on 22.03.22 , where in AO has taxed the entire amount disclosed under IDS amounting to Rs. 3.30 cr in the A.Y. 2017-18 and raised the demand of Rs. 4.08 cr. No credit for taxes paid has been given. assessee come to know this when the demand notice came to him on his mail

whether AO is correct in taxing the amount disclosed in IDS for A.Y. 2015-16 in A.Y.2017-18

Whether not giving the credit of taxes paid under IDS is justified

pl guide the correct action to be taken in this regards,

File Uploaded: Not Available


The Action of the Ld. AO is not correct. Similar matters are pending before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. The decision will have a bearing on the assessee.



Disclaimer: This article is only for general information and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers desiring legal advice should consult with an experienced professional to understand the current law and how it may apply to the facts of their case. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org
2 comments on “Invalid IDS- declaration and assessment u/sec.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act.
  1. Pawan Singla says:

    Supreme court did extend the time limit in a case with interest payment.

  2. rahul says:

    143(2) rws147 after filing the return. in 143(2)notice another ITR date is mentioned that was filed for another notice. isnst it invalid ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*