Question And Answer
Subject: Penalty u/s 271DA, failure to comply with provisions of section 269ST(Mode of undertaking transactions )
Category: 
Querist: Suresh Goyal
Answered by:
Tags: , , , ,
Date: August 8, 2024
Query asked by Suresh Goyal

Penalty u/s 271DA was imposed against the assessee but details of the transaction have not been given in the SCN issued before imposing penalty. Even the amount of penalty to be imposed not mentioned in the SCN. Is the penalty is valid.

File Uploaded: Not Available


Answer given by

Section 271DA reads as under:
“(1) If a person receives any sum in contravention of the provisions of section 269ST, he shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of such receipt:
Provided that no penalty shall be imposable if such person proves that there were good and sufficient reasons for the contravention.
(2) Any penalty imposable under sub- section (1) shall be imposed by the Joint Commissioner.
Thus you will find that no where in the section, it is required that the Joint Commission should mentioned the details of transaction and proposed penalty amount. So it is not necessary to mention in SCN details of transactions and amount of penalty.



Disclaimer: This article is only for general information and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers desiring legal advice should consult with an experienced professional to understand the current law and how it may apply to the facts of their case. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*