Question And Answer
Subject: Undisclosed income and Penalty U/sec. 271D
Category: 
Querist: manali
Answered by: Reply of the Expert is awaited;
Tags:
Date: December 30, 2023
Query asked by manali

Assessee is firm engaged in the business of construction. On the basis of noting on the seized paper found during the course of search with Mr. X, and his admission before ITSC . Notice U/sec 153 C was issued and AO with approval of Addl CIT made the addition of the amount mentioned in the seized papers as undisclosed investment of loan in the hands of assessee u/sec 68 of the Act. Before completion of assessment proceedings Addl CIT has initiated Penalty proceedings u/sec 271D and also levied the penalty U/ 271D on reliance on the same papers . Whether the Action of AO and Addl CIT is justified in Law.
assessee has also asked for effective  Cross examination, application of the X before ITSC and order of ITSC , however AO has denied the same as it is confidential and drawn the inference that assessee has avoided to take cross examination .
pl guide

File Uploaded: Not Available


Answer given by
Reply of the Expert is awaited. Please check back later

Disclaimer: This article is only for general information and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers desiring legal advice should consult with an experienced professional to understand the current law and how it may apply to the facts of their case. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*