The assessee is a owner of land admeasuring 1 lakhs sq ft. Assessee has decided to develop the housing project on the said land in a phased manner. The first phase is on a plot of land having area 2500 sq mtr. The project satisfies all the conditions of the section. After obtaining the completion certificate of the project assessee has commenced phased 2, which also satisfies all the conditions of the section. However, the AO has issued a show cause that in view of section 80IBA(2)(e), that assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80IBA on the plot of land…
► Read Answer
Our is a limited company and has agriculture land in Amritsar, the same has been acquired by NHAI in 2020-2021, will land acquisition officer levy tds on our company before making payments in case of limited company or no tds will be applicable?
► Read Answer
What is legal position whether interest U/sec. 234 A and 234 B is Tobe charged on income returned by the assessee or income assessed by the AO. Whether decision of Smt Tejkumari v CIT 114 Taxman 404 is still binding ? Pl guide
► Read Answer
sir, During assessment proceedings , consequent to revision u/s 263 , the range additional commissioner of income tax has issued directions u/s 144A of the Act, whether the addl commisioner action in issuing directions to the concerned assessing officer is valid in law , he issued letter to the assesse for hearing. further , the additional commissioner of income tax issued letters to the partners of the assessee for hearing . pl guide me and any relevant case law
► Read Answer
Assessee is an individual and has made claim U/Sec. 54F in respect of investment in the bungalow along with the land. while executing the agreement , the assessee has executed Registered Development Agreement , where in the description of property it is clearly mentioned that it is land with the constructed bungalow. However the AO has rejected the claim on the ground that the investment made by the assessee in the property is not for purchase of house property by the assessee but assessee had taken it for the purpose of Development of the property. Assessee is not engaged in…
► Read Answer
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in the business of construction. assessee firm has filed the declaration under IDS for A.Y. 2015-16 and 2016-17 in respect of Income earned during the relevant A.Y. .In the said declaration assessee firm has claimed the credit for payment of advance tax paid prior , however the PCIT has not allowed the credit and considered the IDS declaration as invalid . The assessee firm has filed the WP against denial of credit of advance tax in IDS declaration and the same is pending before the HC. AO has issued the Notice U/SEc. 148 on 30.06.2021…
► Read Answer
Facts of the case: 1. Assessee is carrying on business of manufacturing paper bags and ROI is filed u/s 44AD till AY 20-21. 2. For AY 21-22 alongwith manufacturing activity he has also done Futures and Options transactions the summary is as below: Manufacturing Activity- Turnover Rs. 9.91 lk and Profit Rs. 1.59 lk F&O - Turnover Rs. 2.24 crore and Loss Rs. 3.12 lk Assessee has prepared separate P&L for both business and common balance sheet. Query: 1. Can assessee take the benefit of Proviso to Section 44AB(a) (As nothing in Cash for F&O business- criteria met. For manufacturing…
► Read Answer
Let's say one of the share holder, A (Non- resident), of ABC Pvt has renounced his right to subscribe to right issue to D (Non- resident). Would D attract provisions of sec 56(2)(x)? Also what would be the tax implication on A?
► Read Answer
Search warrant is issued in the name of Mrs X and her son Y. Mrs X owns Flat no 1 in first floor and her son Mr Y owns Flat no 20 in 3rd floor. Only Flat no 1 is mentioned in the search warrant containing the names of Mrs X and Mr Y. This issue was not contested at the time of search Mr Y was not in the premises at the time of search, summons were issued only to Mrs X and not Mr Y. Now, 153A notices are issued to Mr Y also seeking him to file…
► Read Answer
The assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing of machinery required for construction activity. The intrinsic value of its shares is Rs. 150/- (Face value Rs. 10/-). The FMV of the shares is Rs. 200/-. The company is issuing right shares to the existing shareholders at par i.e Rs. 10/- per share. What are the tax implications of this transaction under Income Tax Act as well as Companies Act? Please Guide
► Read Answer
Claim of Deduction U/Sec. 80IBA