What are the consequences of 271(1)C ? also how to prove and how to solve 271 1c ?
► Read Answer
What is the remedy for assessee if appeal effect order is not given correctly by AO on ITAT orders and the same resulted in lower refunds and interest thereon.
► Read Answer
The assessee had issues that had gone to ITAT for ASST YEAR 2006-07 and thereafter AO gave appeal effect order.THEREAFTER the AO compared normal income and 115JB calculations .However in 115JB calculations the AO ignored 88E which per settled law is allowable from tax on 115JB income(PER KARNATAKA HC AND DELDI HC).The AO granted LOWER refunds on basis of 115JB calculations as it is higher on TAXABILITY as rebate was denied of section 88E from tax on 115JB.BEFORE CIT(A) AND ITAT 88E AND 115JB THINGS WERE CONSEQUENTIAL ISSUE AS STT AND NON STT INCOME CALULATIONS WERE MAIN ISSUES. QUESTIONS 1.WHAT…
► Read Answer
The assessee sold an immovable property and deposited sale consideration to the tune of caital gain under Capital gain scheme account and claimed deduction in ITR 2020-21 under 54F. Thereafter, the assessee demised before utilizing the deopsoit amount as per scheme. What will be tax treatment of Capital gain in case, the legal heir of assessee does not purchase any property or does not utilise the money as per scheme.
► Read Answer
hello, i just want to know if dairy farming income is below 2.5 lakh. is it taxable? thanks.
► Read Answer
if in a private ltd co , strike off by roc can AO pass orders under section 144 and taxed . second question whether all receipts can be treated as income of a pvt ltd co who is builder . case laws in favour of assessee please
► Read Answer
i made computation of income in a simple paper in response to notice u/s 148. ROI was not filed u/s 148. Whether computation of income is sufficient in place of return of income and valid. The AO has treated as income of the assessee as per computation of income. it is valid or invalid, please intimate
► Read Answer
During the course of assessment proceedings , for verification of Purchases called for information U/Sec. 133(6) from few parties at the flag end of assessment proceedings . Few parties responded and few not. Assessing Officer completed assessment by making addition of all purchases effected from these parties on the following grounds:: a. Parties have not responded therefore those are not genuine. b. Parties who have responded have not provided full information and provided details of their PAN and Financials alongwith account extract of assessee and confirm the amount of purchases . Whether action of Assessing Officer justified when a. He…
► Read Answer
Sold house involving LTCG - What are the must-to-d0 as the proceeds have been kept in parents' Savings & FD Bank Accounts; What would be the index from 2009 (purchase-deed) to 2021 (sale deed) ? For purchase, part investment was from Sister, who has now been paid with compensation for those 12 years - Eligible Interest on such borrowed money was never claimed in any of the Assessment Years from FY 2009-10 till FY 2020-21;
► Read Answer
The assessee is an individual engaged in the retail trade business. He has offered the income u/s 44AD by applying net profit rate at 10% of gross receipts of Rs. 15,10,125/-. For A.Y 2015-16, on the basis of information that assessee has deposited cash of Rs.8,70,500/- in bank. In response to notice u/s 148, the assessee has stated this cash is deposited out of his business receipts of Rs. 15,10,125/- and which is more than cash deposited in savings bank and therefore no addition on account of unexplained cash deposit in the bank account can be made. The AO has…
► Read Answer
271(1)c, Concealment penalty