Answers By Expert: Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal
  Reassessment and search action u/Sec. 132
Assesseee co  is developer and Builder. Search action U/sec. 132 has been conducted in the year 2022-23. During the course of search one pen drive was found with one of the employee, which contains the noting of cash transcation. On the basis of such noting and statement of few employees and one of the director,  where in they have accepted the noting are in respect of cash transcations carried out by assesseee and group co.   On the basis of such admission Mr. A received Notice from AO , asking the Mr.A as to why amount mentioned on the seized…


► Read Answer

  interest on pvt home loan
1 can it be claimed from IFHP ? 2. can pvt loan for home loan fall u/s 80C ?


► Read Answer

  income tax section 11, 12 and 50CA
The trust registered u/s 12AA and 80G received unquoted shares as donation and sold the shares by market auction. the sale price was below net worth of shares. whether provisions of section 50CA will be applicable on the trust.


► Read Answer

  Indexation on listed shares
Sir, My client is having long-term capital gains on the sale of shares(Listed). can I pay tax at 20% by taking the indexation benefit. Please clarify.


► Read Answer

  NON RESOPONSE TO NOTICE U/sec. 133(6) and claim of expenses
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in business of real estate development. The assesse firm had appointed few contracteors to carry out construction of the project. In support of its claim for expenses , asssssee firm had submitted confirmations from all parties, giving details such as name, address, PAN and detailed account extract of all the parties and also submitted that all the payments were Made through normal banking channels.  Ao issued Notices U/Sec. 133(6) to 6 parties, out that only one party responded even though the Notice U/sec 133(6) were duly served. However while completing the assessment AO had disallowed…


► Read Answer

  Penalty U/Sec. 271E on the basis of noting on seized papers
The assessee is a company wherein in the assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Act for A.Y 2021-22, addition of Rs. 70,00,000/- was made u/s 68 of the Act on account of unaccounted cash loan repayments on the basis of noting on seize papers found during the course of search conducted in the year 2021-2022. The director of the company has accepted the above referred seize paper noting in his personal capacity. However, AO has made an addition of Rs. 70,00,000/- as undisclosed income in the hands of assessee company and similar addition has been made on the protective basis…


► Read Answer

  Transfer pricing
when indian co buys services  from AE abroad  there are no other transactions to compare AE has not sold services  to 3rd party except indian counterpart   which method will justify ALP ?


► Read Answer

  24(b)
Regarding the deduction available u/s 24b of Income Tax Act, Can a son who is the co-borrower of the loan taken for construction of house claim the deduction u/s 24(b). Please note that he is not the owner/co-owner but complete EMI is getting deducted from his bank savings account. His mother is the only owner of the property. Sec 24(b) applicable where the property has been acquired, constructed, repaired, renewed or reconstructed with borrowed capital, the amount of any interest payable on such capital: Please help on this issue. Thanks


► Read Answer

  Late return of income filed pursuant to time limit provided in the notice u/s 148
Notice under section 148 was issued on 22 March 2017 which mentioned that return of income needs to filed within 30 days. However ROI pursuant to notice under section 148 was filed on 15 December 2017 i.e., after the due date mentioned in 148 notice. Order was passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act. Is it still mandatory to issue notice under section 143(2) even if the ROI was filed beyond the time limit provided in notice under section 148?


► Read Answer

  Tax implication of Debit balaknce to capital account of retiring partner
M/S. ABC is partnership firm, having 4 partners. As per retirement deed executed on 31.03.22, two partners retire from the firm w.e.f.1.04.2022. As on the date of retirement these two partners were debit balalce in the firm. Firm is continued by the continuing partners and writoff the amount due from the retirng partner and claimed as expenditure. 1. Whether firm can claimed this As expenditure? 2. Whether any tax liability in the hands of firm ? 3. Tax implication in the hands of partner ? Whether they are liable to pay tax on amount payable by them to firm?


► Read Answer