Answers By Expert: Law Intern
The deduction claimed was wrong and 148 notice issued for income escaping assessment. When the wrong deduction now rectified and showing the correct income in ITR filed u/s 148, which return will be considered by the ITO.
► Read Answer
the assessee had applied for recognition as eligible business in December 2024 but is yet to obtain the recognition. IS there a possibility for the assessee to file a return and claim exemption under the section notwithstanding the fact that the recognition is yet to be obtained
► Read Answer
Attached is a draft of Deed of Release and Reconstitution of HUF. The HUF has a Karta, a Member (wife) and 2 coparceners, one a married daughter and other unmarried son. We intend to reconstitute the constitution of HUF. The Member ( wife ) and one coparcener (married daughter) will be leaving / exiting the HUF voluntarily and then the Karta and unmarried son will continue with the HUF in same name. There is no transfer of assets involved. What will be stamp duty payable in Maharashtra and under which Act or Govt Orders. It will be nice if exact…
► Read Answer
I have taken a land from Cuttack development authority for 99 years lease now the income tax department asking why 194 i will not be applied. kindly justify the same
► Read Answer
My case is I have given for JDA and got six Flats in return. Occupancy Certificate issued in this FY. I have sold two flats in this FY and want to retain 4 Flats and claim deferment of Tax for retained Flats.
► Read Answer
Sir, A gst registered medicines retail dealer tax rate 12 percent tax rate decrease 5 percentage from 22-09-25 Question; Dealer tax rate difference benefits itc reverse compulsory.
► Read Answer
While the Re-assessment proceedings based on the finding in a third party search holding the fact of cash transaction itself pending in appeal which remains subjudice, whether such Penalty to be levied without waiting for decison in the appeals against re-asst proceedings.
► Read Answer
Reassessment Summary – A.Y. 2017-18 Original Notice u/s 148The first notice under section 148 was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO), Ward 31(1)(1), Mumbai on 27.04.2021, i.e., during the transition period between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021. Subsequent Proceedings post-Ashish Agarwal JudgmentAfter the Ashish Agarwal decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, a notice under section 148A(b) was issued on 26.05.2022 by ITO Ward 2(2)(3), Mumbai (a different officer).Thereafter, the order u/s 148A(d) and fresh notice u/s 148 were issued on 30.07.2022, after obtaining approval from the PCIT. Issues for Consideration Jurisdictional Validity of NoticeThe reassessment notice u/s 148 can be issued…
► Read Answer