Assesse has been carrying on the business of lending money on interest, he has offered the income of interest u/s Section 44AD at 88% against the statutory requirement of 6%. 12% of the income have been incurred on expenses such as Bank charges, Depreciation, insurance of Car and its running expenses, salary of accountant/manager and Telephone Expenses. The case have been reopened for the A.Y. 2020-21 u/s 148 of the I.T Act, 1961 on the ground that income should have been offered under the head of Income from Other sources. Query: Whether the action of the A.O is justified? Any…
► Read Answer
Order for A.Year 2004-05 was passed u/s 143(3) & deman created which was partially paid as we were in appeal,after CIT Appeals,Tribunal & High Court we got favourable order in our favour in 2012 & after writing & visiting department order u/s 262(3)/143 was passed on 2.7.2018 but refund was received on 27.10.2020 & later on received refund against interest on 18.8.2022 & after rectifications u/s 154 received refunds again on21.11.2023 I am asking interest u/s 244(1A) but department has paid interest @6% that too upto 2.7.2018 date of order passed u/s 262(3)/143,want clarification on same.
► Read Answer
The requirement of Section 24(b) where the property has been acquired, constructed, repaired, renewed, or reconstructed with borrowed capital, the amount of any interest payable on such capital is allowable. The deduction can be claimed while computing the income from house property . On the facts the income from house property is not offered in the hands of co -borrower . Facts also not clear whether the co -borrower is co -owner . on the facts the assessee may not be eligible to claim deduction. under section 24(b) of the Act. In ITO v. Mamta Rajivkumar Agarwal (Smt.) (2022) 100 ITR…
► Read Answer
Assesseee is promoter and developers. Has taken the loan from Bank. Bank has stiputed condition that amount will be used for the project only. However, considering the status of the project, assessee has advanced the loan to its associate firm and earn the interest. Assessee has claimed the interest as part of cost of construction after reducing the interest received from associate concern. AO has not appreciated the concept Netting of Interest and made the addition on the decision of Tuticorin Alkali 227 ITR 172. Whether assessee can take a stand in appellate proceedings that since there is direct nexus…
► Read Answer
I have paid interest on personal loan taken for acquisition of a capital asset . i want to claim the interest paid by adding to the cost of the asset . can I have case laws allowing the same as my Ao has disallowed the same
► Read Answer
1 can it be claimed from IFHP ? 2. can pvt loan for home loan fall u/s 80C ?
► Read Answer
My assessee received Form No.5 of VSVS and afterwards in the Income Tax Department Internal Audit or AG Audit came and raised an objection regarding incorrect calculation of interest although completed through ITBA portal. Subsequently the AO issued notice u/s154 and passed order u/s154 raising the tax liability. Is this stand of the department is correct or challengeable in appeal or petition u/s264 may be filed or writ in HC may be filed.. Please suggest..
► Read Answer
What is the remedy for non payment of refunds under VSVT , 2020 ? Is it liable to any compensatory interest ?
► Read Answer
The assessee company original assessment for asst year 2006-07 was completed u/s 143(3) in 2008. Assessee case was reopened in 2010 and 143(3)/147 was done in 2010.Assessee paid taX determined within 30 days in 2011. ASSESSEE preferred appeal and got part relief in 2011 from cit appeal.In itat also some relief was granted IN 2016/2019 .The assessee was given appeal effect order in 2022 january for both cit appeal and itat .(appeal effect given in jan 2022 for both). However on perusal it is seen that interest u/s 244A is 6 pc per annum.The assessee feels that interest u/s 244A(1A)…
► Read Answer
What is legal position whether interest U/sec. 234 A and 234 B is Tobe charged on income returned by the assessee or income assessed by the AO. Whether decision of Smt Tejkumari v CIT 114 Taxman 404 is still binding ? Pl guide
► Read Answer
Interest on advances and applicability of Sec 44AD.