After ITAT quashed order u/s 263 passed by pcit , AO issues notice u/s 154 on same point, what can be the remedy with Assessee? Does it partake contempt of order of ITAT ? any case law?
► Read Answer
Can AO issue notice i/s 148A when notice u/s 263 is pending on same point ?
► Read Answer
PF/ESI deposited after due dates of respective Acts but before due date of filing ITR for A.Y. prior to A.Y. 21-22. Jurisdictional ITAT, Indore Bench consistently deleted the additions made on the above issue, holding that amendments made by Finance Bill 2021 on the above issues are not applicable before 31.03.2021. No subsequent order of Jurisdictional High Court of MP Revision u/s 264 filed before Jurisdictional P.C.I.T. Indore. Query Whether the order of Jurisdictional ITAT are binding in Revision u/s 264? Whether different view can be taken? Citation Please Thanks & Regards
► Read Answer
Assessee is a charitable trust duly registered u/s 12A of the Act. Assessment for A.Y 2015-16 was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act in October, 2017 by assessing the income in the hands of the assessee as charitable trust which is registered u/s 12A of the Act. Registration u/s 12A was cancelled in May, 2018 on the ground that the trust had indulged in illegal activities by accepting capitation fees and therefore the trust is sham or bogus, disregarding the fact that the trust is involved in educational activities and also accepted by the department in past since its inception…
► Read Answer
Assessee is partnership Firm filed the Return of Income For A.Y. 2009-10. while uploading the return due to some problem in soft ware the claim of Depreciation was not correctly uploaded and also received the Intimation U/Sec. 143(1)(a) from CPC Banglore in the month of Dec. 2010. In this intimation , the adjustment of amount of Depreciation was made and demand was raised . The assessee was unaware of this fact, and when the call came from TRO in April 2022, the assessee came to know such demand. Assessee firm has claimed the depreciation on the WDV as on 31.03.2009…
► Read Answer
Assessee is company. Consequent to search proceedings U/SEc. 132 of the Act in the Year 2015-16, assessee co filed the Returns of income in response in response to Notice U/SEc. 153A for A.Y. 2010-11 to 2016-17. Assessment U/SEc. 153A r.w.s. 143(3) were completed on 28.12.2017 as per the income disclosed in the Return as no incriminating material was found. Thereafter Audit objection was received by the assessee co for A.Y. 2013-14, where the diffrence in sale as per assessment order and audit report under MVAT act was pointed out. The department has issued Notice U/Sec. 154 on 22.05.2018, to which…
► Read Answer
Client Assessment was completed under 143(3) and appeal was filed and later opted for Vivad se vishwas scheme. Taxes paid. Now PCIT issues SCN under section 263 for reopening of Assessment for the same issue higher quantum. Is it permitted?
► Read Answer
sir, During assessment proceedings , consequent to revision u/s 263 , the range additional commissioner of income tax has issued directions u/s 144A of the Act, whether the addl commisioner action in issuing directions to the concerned assessing officer is valid in law , he issued letter to the assesse for hearing. further , the additional commissioner of income tax issued letters to the partners of the assessee for hearing . pl guide me and any relevant case law
► Read Answer
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in the business of construction and development of housing project. Assessee firm has filed the Return of Income for AY 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. While filling the Return of Income as per advice of CA, added back the difference in stamp duty valuation and actual consideration u/sec 43CA of the Act. While making this disallowance, assessee firm has added the difference even though the same is less than 10%. Since the disallowance was huge, assessee firm has uploaded the Return with out making payment of self assessment tax. All the returns are processed u/143(1A) of…
► Read Answer
263 Revision