R. Mani v.CCIT (2018) 406 ITR 450/253 Taxman 3/ 164 DTR 114/ 302 CTR 250 (Mad) (HC)

S. 234A: Interest – Default in furnishing return of income -Bonafide family dispute -Entitle to waiver of ninterest . [ S. 119,133A, 148,234B, 234C]

The assessee approached the Chief Commissioner under S.119(2)(a) for waiver of interest. The assessee in his application for waiver stated that he was under the bona fied belief that he had no taxable income and therefore not required to file a return. The Chief Commissioner had rejected the petition for waiver on the grounds that the assessee failed to voluntarily file its return but the return were filed consequent upon a survey conducted under S. 133A and issuance of notice under section 148 and tax on the assessed income was not paid which was a pre-condition for waiver of interest. On writ the Court held that the property continued to be in the name of the HUF i.e. it remained undivided and there were serious civil disputes between the family members. Thus, when the property continues to remain undivided, the assessee cannot anticipate the accrual/receipt of such income hence the assesse was right in the befief that he had no taxable income. The High Court also held that the return was filed well before the issuance of notice under section 148 and merely because there was a survey counducted in premises canot be stated that the ROI was not voluntatily filed by the assesse. Hence the assesse would be entitle to waiver of interest levied under section 234A. the High Court also observed that the circular (Circular No. 400/234/95 dated 30-1-1997) issued by the Board empowering the Chief Commissioner to consider the waiver petition for waiver of interest under S 234A as well as S. 234B would show that even in cases covered by section 234B and even though these provisions are compensatory in nature, special orders for grant of relaxation could be passed. It was further held that the dispute with regard to the division of property was a bona fide dispute which directly relates to the assessbility of the petitioner to tax. Therefore, if the petitioner is entitled for waiver of interest under S. 234A for the reasons set out above, the question of payment of advance tax nor a portion thereof will not arise and therefore, the petitioner is entitled for waiver of interest under S. 234B and 234C as well. (AY. 1997-98 , 1998-99)