Ramakant v. ITO (2023) 294 Taxman 48 / 333 CTR 791(Delhi)(HC)/Editorial : Review petition is dismissed , Ramakant v. ITO (2023) ( 2023) 333 CTR 786 ( Delhi)( HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Cash credits-Search-Deposit of cash in bank-No scrutiny assessment was done-Reassessment notice is held to be justified.[S. 68, 143(1), 147, Art. 226]

Dismissing the petition the Court held  although assessee  had filed his return for relevant assessment year, however, he did not dispute fact that he had deposited cash amount in bank account.  Accordingly the reopening notice under section 148 was justified.  (AY. 2012-13)