S.S. Hyderabad Biriyanai (P.) Ltd v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2024) 298 Taxman 198/ 160 taxmann.com 418/465 ITR 410 (SC) Editoorial : S.S. Hyderabad Biriyanai (P.) Ltd v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2024) 160 taxmann.com 417 (Mad)(HC)

S. 277 : Offences and prosecutions-False statement-Verification-Prosecution was launched two years prior to date of filing of application before Settlement Commission-Pending of prosecution was not brought to the notice of Settlement Commission-Provision of section 245I is not applicable-Proceedings canot be quashed-SLP of assessee is dismissed.[S. 245C, 245I, Art. 136]

Assessing Officer initiated prosecution against assessee for offence under section 277.  Assessee filed an application before Settlement Commission under section 245C and disclosed additional income and paid tax. Settlement Commission granted immunity from prosecution. However, assessee filed petition to quash proceedings initiated against it under section 277. Dismissing the petition the Court held that   prosecution proceedings under Income-tax Act were launched two years back and factum of pending prosecution was not brought to notice of Settlement Commission. Assessee concealed fact of such pending prosecution for offence under section 277 and obtained immunity in respect of prosecution and same was not brought to knowledge of Settlement Commission. High Court also held that  since prosecution was initiated two years before date of filing settlement application, provisions under section 245-I was not applicable and, thus, prosecution proceedings against assessee could not be quashed.  SLP filed by assessee against said  order is   dismissed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*