HELD by the High Court that since no oral directions were given by the Court, as communicated (mis-represented) by the Petitioner to TRO and bankers for fraudulently withdraw money from attached bank account, the conduct of the Petitioner does not deserve any relief under the extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction and it shall be disentitled to any relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (W.P. No 13099 of 2017 dt. 05-01-2018).
Sinhgad Technical Education Society .v. DCIT (2018) 162 DTR 185 /301 CTR 26 (Bom)(HC)
S. 220 : Collection and recovery – Assessee deemed in default –Maintainability of Writ vis-à-vis fraudulent withdrawal from attached bank account – Conduct of the assessee disentitles it to any relief under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.