Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Other Laws
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Calcutta HighCourt has held that Deific Abode LLP Vs Union of India & Ors Date -16th April, 2021 Forum- Calcutta High Court Sub-Whether the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended in the year 2016 is prospective or retrospective in nature- Doctrine of Precedent explained threadbare in view of the stay of operation of Calcutta High Court in… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that *IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VERSUS PEARL BEVERAGES LTD. JUDGMENT* *Forum- Supreme Court of India* *Date -12th April, 2021* *Sub-Whether Insurance company is liable to pay compensation for loss of car which was being driven under the influence of alchohol- Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act , Section 106 of Evidence Act analysed threadbare*-… Read More ...
The Kerala High Court has held that *Jayama Xavier Vs Registrar of Firms* *Date-08/04/2021* *Court- Kerala High Court* *Sub-Whether a LLP can be a partner in a partnership firm constituted under Indian Partnership Act, 1932.* The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Jayama Xavier Vs Registrar of firm was considering the rejection of registration of deed of partnership which was… Read More ...
The Delhi High court has held that Power of RBI to withhold remittance to be made under Automatic route to Wholly owned Subsidiary- cannot be used to reject the remittance on whimsical and arbitrary reasons Court- Delhi High court Date -26th March 2021 Citation-Reserve Bank of India Vs Jindal STeel and Power Limited. In this era of globalisation where the global trade… Read More ...
The Gujarat High Court has held that Assignment of Interest in Leasehold land owned by the Partnership by one partner to another -whether amounts to transfer liable for payment of stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act. Forum-Gujarat High Court Date-22/03/2021 Citation-Collector of Stamp & Ors Vs Tulsi Rice & Pulse Mill The Gujarat high court in this case was called upon… Read More ...
The Gauhati High Court has held that Whether amount of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess which have already been refunded in terms of decision of a Supreme Court can again be demanded by issuance of show cause notice u/s 11A of the Central Excise Act. Forum-Gauhati High Court Date-15th March 2021 Citation-Topcem India Vs Union of India In a… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that Sub-Limitation for filing appeal before Commissioner(Appeals)-Section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994-three months and 90 days doesn’t mean same thing-difference between the word “filed” and “presented” -period how to be computed- Citation-Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Pvt ltd Vs Commissioner(Appeals) and another Date-12th March 2021 Court-Bombay High Court In a photofinish kind of a situation where… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that Landmark decision in the matter of Customs- Canon India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs Forum-Supreme Court of India Date-9th March 2021 Sub: When once an assessment has been made by the Proper officer, whether the appellate or revision authority has power to do reassessment. Powers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence explained. The apex court… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that Outstanding fees of an Advocate re Joint case filed by Husband and wife- Cheque issued by husband returned due to insufficient funds -whether Wife is liable u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act-Supreme Court settles the law. Forum-Supreme Court of India Date- 08th March 2021 Citation-Alka Khandu Avhad Vs Amar Syamprasad Mishra & Anrs An interesting… Read More ...
The Supreme Court of India has held that *FRANKLIN TEMPLETON TRUSTEE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER VERSUS AMRUTA GARG AND OTHERS* Forum -Supreme Court of India Date-12/02/2021 *Sub-Whether winding up of the schemes of the Franklin Templeton based on the consent of the unit holders in the e-voting was valid or it required consent of all the Unit Holders* . An interesting issue… Read More ...