Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Other Laws
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Bombay High court has held that Declaration under Sabka Sath Sabka Vishwas Legacy scheme rejected- Bombay High court sets aside the rejection order allowing the Writ. The Bombay High court in the case of Thought Blurb Vs Union of India & Ors in WP No 871 of 2020 on 27th October, 2020 was dealing with a writ where the petitioner challenged… Read More ...
The Bombay High court has held that Whether cart can be put after the horse- how without dealing with the facts, the operative part of the order can be recorded? Bombay High court comes down heavily on Customs officer and sets aside the order in a landmark decision pronounced on 27/10/2020 The Bombay High court in the case of The Supreme Industries… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that Issue of notice under SARFESI Act by L & T Housing Finance Limited wrongly on the letter head of L & T Finance Ltd- Challenge by the borrower as illegal- Supreme Court holds the challenge to be baseless. The Apex Court on 27th October, 2020 in the case of L & T Housing Finance Ltd… Read More ...
The Calcutta High court has held that Whether proceedings for declaration of wilful defaulter can continue pending moratorium under the IBC Law-Calcutta high court land mark ruling The Calcutta high court in the case of Sandip Kumar Bajaj & Ors Vs SBI in WP No 236 of 2020 on 15/9/2020 was considering challenge to a SCN issued by State Bank of India… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that Father in law Vs Daughter in law-Supreme court pronounces landmark decision The Apex Courtin the case of Satish Chander Ahuja Vs Sneha Ahuja in Civil Appeal No 2483 of 2020 dismissed the appeal of father in law where interalia it was argued that the house property where daughter in law was staying since marriage was… Read More ...
The THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA has held that It is well settled that the onus of proof lies on the party who makes an allegation. It is well settled that time is not of essence to agreements for sale of immovable property, unless the agreement specifically and expressly incorporates the consequence of cancellation of the agreement, upon failure to comply with a term… Read More ...
The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY has held that 22. However, the moot point to be noted is that the period of limitation of three months commences from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated and not from the date of decision of the Committee of Commissioners. This aspect was examined by this Court in the recent decision… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that (i) S. 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 confers status of coparcener on daughters born before or after amendment in the same manner as son with the same rights and liabilities, (ii) The rights can be claimed by the daughter born earlier with effect from 9.9.2005 with savings as provided in Section 6(1) as… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that The settled legal position is that when by virtue of a family settlement or arrangement, members of a family descending from a common ancestor or a near relation seek to sink their differences and disputes, settle and resolve their conflicting claims or disputed titles once and for all in order to buy peace of mind… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that S. 45 Capital Gains: In matters relating to compulsory acquisition of land under the Act of 1894, completion of transfer with vesting of land in the Government essentially correlates with taking over of possession of the land under acquisition by the Government. However, where possession is taken over before arriving of the relevant stage for… Read More ...