| Court: | Mumbai Tribunal |
| Head Notes: | S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Foreign assets-Foreign investments were jointly held with the assessee’s husband, acquired through disclosed remittances in earlier years under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS), and supported by contemporaneous documentary evidence including bank statements, PMS reports, reconciliation statements, balance sheets and Schedule FA disclosures of both co-holders-No addition under section 69 could be made by treating the husband’s share of investment as unexplained investment in the hands of the assessee merely on suspicion and without any contrary evidence- Addition towards unexplained foreign investment deleted. [S. 143(3), 144B, Schedule FA] Ira Maulik Shah v. ITO (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatoline.org [Coram : Hon’ble Shri Amit Shukla, JM and Hon’ble Shri Arun Khodpia, AM] |
| Law: | Income-Tax Act |
| Section(s): | S 69 |
| Counsel(s): | Dr. K. Shivaram, Sr. Advocate and Rahul Hakani Advocate |
| Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
| Uploaded By | itatonline |
| Date of upload: | July 3, 2026 |
Leave a Reply