ITO v. Priya Farrokh Barbana Irani (ITAT Mumbai)

Court: ITAT Mumbai
Head Notes:

If only a small portion of the consideration for the purchase of a property was paid during the year, the addition u/s 69 of the entire purchase consideration cannot be made in the assessment of that one year (Para 11).

If the Assessee furnishes corroborative and supporting documentary evidences before the CIT (A) which substantiates the explanation already given before the AO, no fault can be found with the CIT (A) in admitting the said evidences and there was no violation of Rule 46A (Para 9).

Law:
Section(s): Section 69, Rule 46A
Counsel(s): Rahul Sarda, for Assessee and Virabhadra Mahajan, for Revenue
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By ITAT Online Manager
Date of upload: June 4, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*