Karmic Labs Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Court: ITAT Mumbai
Head Notes:

S. 56(2)(viib)/ Rule 11UA: The assessee has the choice to choose a prescribed method for ascertaining the market value of the shares transferred. If the assessee has chosen one method of valuation provided under Rule 11UA (i.e. DCF method), the AO has no power or jurisdiction to change that method to another method (All imp judgements referred)

Section 56 allows the assessees to adopt one of the methods of their choice. But, the AO held that the assessee should have adopted only one method for determining the value of the shares. In our opinion, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the AO to insist upon a particular system, especially the Act allows to choose one of the two methods. Until and unless the legislature amends the provision of the Act and prescribes only one method for valuation of the shares, the assessee are free to adopt any one of the methods

Law: ,
Section(s): 56(2)(viib), Rule 11UA
Dowload Pdf File
Uploaded By CA Probal Shome
Date of upload: September 27, 2020

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *