Liquidator of the corporate debtor M/s Shirt Company vs. Recovery Officer

Court: Hon'ble NCLT Mumbai
Head Notes:

In this order Hon’ble NCLT held that PF/Gratuity due of the workers is third party asset belonging to poor worker and this asset need to excluded and to be paid in priority in resolution or liquidation without waiting for distribution under Section 53 of the IBC. Hon’ble Court held in operative part as under.
“The Bench also aware of the provision of Section 36(4)(iii) of I & B Code 2016 which states that the amount deducted for `Provident Fund’, purely belongs to an `Employees’ and is not to be treated as an `Asset’ of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ and cannot be touched by an `Interim Resolution Professional’/`Resolution Professional’/ `Liquidator’ as the case may be.
Therefore, The Bench is of the considered view that claims of the EPFO would not fall part of liquidation estate as provided under section 36(4) of the Code and the EPFO dues would not fall under the waterfall mechanism envisaged under Section 53 of the Code.”

Law:
Section(s): Section 31, 36(4) and Section 53 of IBC, Section 11 of EPF&MP Act-1952 and Recovery Provision in Second & Third Schedule of IT Act-1961
Counsel(s): Mr. Rahul Gaikwad, Advocate a/w Adv. Nikita Abhyankar a/w Adv. Aman Jhawar a/w Adv. Garima Joshi i/b Gravitas Legal for liquidator and Ms. Shraddha Talkar, Advocate i/b Ravi Rattesar for Recovery Officer
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By Jasvir
Date of upload: July 22, 2023

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*