Court: | ITAT Mumbai |
Head Notes: | The explanation was there on the record and also explained before the ld. AO and ld. CIT(A), then we fail to understand what was the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose the facts. Ld. AO has tried to draw his own inference in the reasons and tried to justify it without actual finding what was the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly material facts. Accordingly, we hold that the reasons recorded by the ld. AO do not give jurisdiction to reopen the case beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Accordingly, the entire reopening is hereby quashed and consequently the entire re-assessment proceedings as well as order passed by the ld. AO is held to be without jurisdiction and is hereby quashed. |
Law: | Income-Tax Act |
Section(s): | Section 147 |
Counsel(s): | Adv. Bhavesh M Gala and CA Devang Divecha |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Adv Bhavesh M Gala |
Date of upload: | May 21, 2024 |
Leave a Reply