M/s. Prime Developers Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-25(3) (ITAT Mumbai)

Court: ITAT Mumbai
Head Notes:

The explanation was there on the record and also explained before the ld. AO and ld. CIT(A), then we fail to understand what was the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose the facts. Ld. AO has tried to draw his own inference in the reasons and tried to justify it without actual finding what was the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly material facts. Accordingly, we hold that the reasons recorded by the ld. AO do not give jurisdiction to reopen the case beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Accordingly, the entire reopening is hereby quashed and consequently the entire re-assessment proceedings as well as order passed by the ld. AO is held to be without jurisdiction and is hereby quashed.

Law:
Section(s): Section 147
Counsel(s): Adv. Bhavesh M Gala and CA Devang Divecha
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By Adv Bhavesh M Gala
Date of upload: May 21, 2024

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*