Court: | Delhi High court |
Head Notes: | Writ Petition admitted on the point that the assessment has been carried out under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 read with Faceless Assessment (1st Amendment) Scheme, 2021, without the revenue issuing a show-cause notice (accompanied by the relevant material) before proceeding to pass the impugned assessment order. 1. Allowed, subject to the applicant/petitioner curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned applications within 15 days from today. W.P.(C) 5087/2021 and CM APPL. No.15585/2021 [Application filed on 2 According to Mr. Kapil Goel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner assessee, the issue which arises for consideration in the present petition is similar to the issue raised in W.P.(C) 4774/2021 titled KL Trading Corporation vs. National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi & Anr. In this behalf, our attention has been drawn to the order dated 16.04.2021, passed in the said writ petition. 3. Mr. Goel says that the assessment in the instant case has been carried out under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 read with Faceless Assessment (1st Amendment) Scheme, 2021, which willy-nilly required the revenue to issue a show-cause notice (accompanied by the relevant material) before proceeding to pass the impugned assessment order. 3.1. To be noted, the assessment order impugned by the petitioner assessee is dated 30.03.2021. 3.2. In support of his plea, that no show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner-assessee, Mr. Goel relies upon the screenshot of the petitioner assessee’s assessment proceedings on the e-portal, which is extracted in paragraph 4.1 on page 18 of the paper book. 3.3. Furthermore, to buttress this very plea, reliance is also placed on the Central Board of Direct Taxes instruction no. 20/2015, dated 29.12.2015. In particular, Mr. Goel relies on paragraph 4 of the said circular. For the sake of convenience, the same is extracted hereafter: “4. The Board further desires that in all cases under scrutiny, 4. Accordingly, issue notice. 5. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, who appears on behalf of Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, accepts service on behalf of the respondent. We are told that, due to personal difficulty, Mr. Sharma is not available today. 5.1. Counter-affidavit will be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed before the next date of hearing. 6. List the matter on 10.08.2021. 7. In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay on the operation of the |
Law: | Income-Tax Act |
Section(s): | 143 |
Counsel(s): | Mr. Kapil Goel, Advocate, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | Staff |
Date of upload: | May 8, 2021 |
Leave a Reply