M/S SAS FININVEST LLP vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT NEW DELHI (DELHI HIGH COURT)

Court: Delhi High court
Head Notes:

Writ Petition admitted on the point that the assessment has been carried out under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 read with Faceless Assessment (1st Amendment) Scheme, 2021, without the revenue issuing a show-cause notice (accompanied by the relevant material) before proceeding to pass the impugned assessment order.

1. Allowed, subject to the applicant/petitioner curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned applications within 15 days from today.

W.P.(C) 5087/2021 and CM APPL. No.15585/2021 [Application filed on
behalf of the petitioner seeking stay on the operation of the impugned assessment order dated 31.03.2021]

2 According to Mr. Kapil Goel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner assessee, the issue which arises for consideration in the present petition is similar to the issue raised in W.P.(C) 4774/2021 titled KL Trading Corporation vs. National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi & Anr. In this behalf, our attention has been drawn to the order dated 16.04.2021, passed in the said writ petition.

3. Mr. Goel says that the assessment in the instant case has been carried out under the Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 read with Faceless Assessment (1st Amendment) Scheme, 2021, which willy-nilly required the revenue to issue a show-cause notice (accompanied by the relevant material) before proceeding to pass the impugned assessment order.

3.1. To be noted, the assessment order impugned by the petitioner assessee is dated 30.03.2021.

3.2. In support of his plea, that no show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner-assessee, Mr. Goel relies upon the screenshot of the petitioner assessee’s assessment proceedings on the e-portal, which is extracted in paragraph 4.1 on page 18 of the paper book.

3.3. Furthermore, to buttress this very plea, reliance is also placed on the Central Board of Direct Taxes instruction no. 20/2015, dated 29.12.2015. In particular, Mr. Goel relies on paragraph 4 of the said circular. For the sake of convenience, the same is extracted hereafter:

“4. The Board further desires that in all cases under scrutiny,
where the Assessing Officer proposes to make additions or
disallowances, the assessee would be given a fair opportunity to
explain his position on the proposed additions/disallowances in
accordance with the principle of natural justice. In this regard,
the Assessing Officer shall issue an appropriate show-cause
notice duly indicating the reasons for the proposed
additions/disallowances along with necessary evidences/reasons
forming the basis of the same. Before passing the final order
against the proposed additions/disallowances, due consideration shall be given to the submissions made by the assessee in response to the show-cause notice.” [Emphasis is ours]

4. Accordingly, issue notice.

5. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, who appears on behalf of Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, accepts service on behalf of the respondent. We are told that, due to personal difficulty, Mr. Sharma is not available today.

5.1. Counter-affidavit will be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed before the next date of hearing.

6. List the matter on 10.08.2021.

7. In the meanwhile, there shall be a stay on the operation of the
impugned assessment order dated 31.03.2021
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
TALWANT SINGH, J
MAY 4, 2021

Law:
Section(s): 143
Counsel(s): Mr. Kapil Goel, Advocate, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By Staff
Date of upload: May 8, 2021

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*