MSPL Limited v. PCIT (Bombay High Court)

Court: Hon'ble Bombay High Court
Head Notes:

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 19.03.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. The Order pertained to transfer of the said appeals from the Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to Mumbai Benches of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

The Writ Petition was allowed and the transfer was held to be invalid

See article by Advocate Parveen Kumar Bansal (Former ITAT Vice President) and CA Gaurav Bansal: POWER OF PRESIDENT ITAT TO TRANSFER AN APPEAL FROM ONE BENCH TO ANOTHER OUTSIDE THE HEADQUARTERS IN A DIFFERENT STATE!

Law:
Section(s): Section 127, 255, 260A
Counsel(s): Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate & Mr. R.V. Desai, Senior Advocate
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By itat Manager
Date of upload: May 27, 2021
One comment on “MSPL Limited v. PCIT (Bombay High Court)
  1. K Subramanyam Setty says:

    When the jurisdiction over a particular assessee is transferred from one Assessing Officer to another under section 127 of the Act, at the best, the respondent or the appellant as the case may be in the appeal can be changed as in the case of successors in interest brought on record For example: ITO, Ward-1(2), Hyderabad [who passessed the impugned assessment order] represented by ITO, Ward-12(3), Mumbai. But, territorial jurisdiction should always be with the Assessing Officer at the point of time of taking the decision i.e., framing the assessment. If the case continues to go even to the level of Apex Court, the result would effect the original order only viz., upheld or modified or set aside and all the orders passed by CIT(A), ITAT and High Court concerned will be merged to the original assessment order. Therefore, the appeals in MSPL can be transferred from Bangalore Benches to Mumbai Benches for hearing purpose and making the present Assessing Officer as Representative to the original Assessing Officer but the case shall have to be continued with the territorial jurisdiction with Bangalore Benches [Karnataka State].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*