S. 32: Depreciation – Car registered in name of director – Funds utilized of the company – Depreciation is allowable to the company.
Mukesh Trends Lifestyle Limited v. DCIT (Ahd)(Trib)(UR)S. 32: Depreciation – Car registered in name of director – Funds utilized of the company – Depreciation is allowable to the company.
Mukesh Trends Lifestyle Limited v. DCIT (Ahd)(Trib)(UR)S. 272A : Penalty – Failure to answer questions – Sign statements – Furnish information – Substantial compliance – Levy of penalty is not justified. [S. 143(3), 272A(1)(d)]
Pawan International v. ITO (Chd)(Trib) (UR)S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Bogus purchases – Estimated addition – Levy of penalty is not valid.[S.69A]
ITO v. Saraswati Wire And Cable Industries (Mum)( Trib)(UR)S. 263: Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Assessment order passed after making necessary inquiries – Held, revision proceedings cannot be initiated simply because PCIT was of the opinion that further inquiries should have been made on the issue.[ S.143(3) ]
Venerable Advertising P. Ltd. v. PCIT [2024] 109 ITR 81 (SN.) (Kol) (Trib) Editorial: Amritrashi Infra (P) Ltd. v. PR. CIT in ITA No 838/Kol/2019; Assessment Year 2012-13; order dt. 12/08/2020; Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO [2016] 70 taxmann.com 227 (Mum.) (Trib.) Followed.S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – Appeal cannot be dismissed on account of non-prosecution- Order is set aside and directed to decide on merits. [S. 246A, 251(2)]
Pramod Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (Raipur)(Trib) (UR)S. 151 : Reassessment – Sanction for issue of notice – Beyond three years – Specified Authority – Sanction by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- Reassessment notice and order is bad in law.[S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii)]
Parinee Housing Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (Mum)(Trib)(UR)S. 69A : Unexplained moneys – Demonetization – Not taxable as undisclosed income – Best judgement assessment – Order under section 144 is not valid.[S. 115BBE, 144]
Sakina Ahmedali Kantavala v. ITO [2024] 163 taxmann.com 115 (Ahd)(Trib)S. 69A: Unexplained moneys – Search – Cash seized during search – Explained the source of cash – Addition is deleted. [S. 132]
Hemant Samarataji Lohar v. CIT(A) [2024] 163 taxmann.com 292 (SMC) (Mum)(Trib)S. 68: Cash credits – Share capital – Need not prove source of the source – Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed. [S. 131, 133(6)]
DCIT v. Jaymala Infrastructure P. Ltd. (Mum) (Trib) (UR)S. 54F: Capital gains – Investment in a residential house – Joint names – Income has to be assessed in the right person – Indexation benefit is available. [S. 4, 45, 54]
Abdul Nayab Shaikh (Deceased) v. ITO [2024] 167 taxmann.com 381(Mum)( Trib)