Allowing the petition the Court held that, where a Hindu family was never assessed as a Hindu undivided family, section 171 would not apply even when there was a division or partition of property which did not fall within the definition. The notice issued under section 148 to the estate of ARP (HUF) co-parceners and the consequential order issued in the name of the assessee as the karta were unsustainable. (AY. 2008-09)
A.P. Oree (Kartha) v. ITO (2021)436 ITR 3 / 203 DTR 153 / 282 Taxman 57 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Hindu Undivided Family-Partition-Sale consideration-Exemption-Reassessment notice to tax capital gains in the hands of Karta is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 54F, 148, 171, Art. 226]