ACIT v. Dalmia Power Ltd (2019) 418 ITR 242 (Mad.)(HC) ACIT v Dalmia Cement Power Ltd. (2019) 418 ITR 242 (Mad.) (HC) Editorial : Decision in Dalmia Power Ltd / Dalmia Cement ( Bharat ) Ltd v .ACIT (2019) 418 ITR 221 / 308 CTR 777/ 178 DTR 113/ 265 Taxman 37 (Mad.)(HC) is reversed. Order of High Court is reversed Dalmia Power Ltd v ACIT (SC) CA Nos 949669 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP Nos 19678681 of 2019 dt 18 -12-2019 ) (2019 ) 112 taxmann.com 252/ ( 2020) 269 Taxman 352 / 312 CTR 113/ 420 ITR 339/ 185 DTR 1 (SC) www.itatonline.org .

S. 139 : Return of income–Delay in filing revised return-Amalgamation-Sanction of company Law Tribunal is not binding on Income-Tax Authorities-Application for condonation of delay to me made. [S.119, Companies Act, 2013, S. 230(5), Constitution, Art. 226]

Pursuant to sanction of the scheme of arrangement the transferee company attempted to file revised returns without filing an application for condonation of the delay in filing them on the basis that the sanctioned scheme of arrangement and, in particular, clause 64(c) thereof, entitled such filing and was binding on the Income-tax authorities. This contention was accepted by a single judge under article 226 of the Constitution. On appeal, the Court held that the Department had been notified that the scheme of arrangement enabled the amalgamated company and transferee company to file returns and revised returns before the tax authorities, including the Income-tax authority. However, it could not be said that the Department had consented to waive the procedures or statutory requirements prescribed in the Income-tax Act for this purpose. In this regard, the order of the Company Law Tribunal whereby the scheme of arrangement was sanctioned also mandated that necessary permissions should be obtained and compliances fulfilled. The transferee company was required to comply with the procedure for filing a revised return belatedly. (AY. 2015-16, 2016-17)