Assessee-company made payment to overseas parties as shipment clearing and forwarding charges. Assessing Officer held that as per terms of contract between them, assessee was provided with information regarding tariff which would have influenced decision making process and, thus, such services fell under category of consultancy services and payments made to parties were liable for deduction of tax at source. AO invoked provisions of section 40(a)(i) and disallowed payment. Commissioner (Appeals) held that payment received by overseas parties neither fell under section 9(1) nor under section 9(1)(vii) and since income could not be described as deemed to accrue or arise in India, taxability of such amount failed and, accordingly, deleted disallowance. On appeal the Tribunal affirmed the order of the CIT(A). (AY. 2017-18, 2018-19)
ACIT v. LX Pantos India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 207 ITD 680 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Shipment clearing and forwarding charges-Payment is not chargeable to tax in India-Disallowance is deleted-Article 12 of OECD Model Convention. [S.9(1)(vi), 195]
Leave a Reply