A writ petition was filed on the ground that the respondent officers situated in Bangalore had entered upon, and conducted search and seizure in the premises of the assessee, at Chennai, in the face of the admitted position that he fell under the jurisdiction of the officers at Chennai and this was illegal and contrary to the Act. Court held that the records showed that the warrant of authorisation dated August 29, 2017 in regard to the search conducted on August 30, 2017 had been issued in form 45, in the name of the assessee, by the Deputy Director (Investigation), Bengaluru. The warrant of authorisation and consequent search proceedings were not valid. Court also held that notification No. S. O. 2914(E) Dated 13-11-2014,Extension of territorial jurisdiction only in respect of place of search and no extension of territorial jurisdiction with regard to assesses.
Anil Jain v. PDIT (Inv) (2023)456 ITR 274 / 223 DTR 241 / 331 CTR 677 / 150 taxmann.com 284 (Mad)(HC)
S. 132 : Search and seizure-Territorial jurisdiction-Notification No. S. O. 2914(E) Dated 13-11-2014-Extension of territorial jurisdiction only in respect of place of search-No extension of territorial jurisdiction with regard to assesses-Search warrant in form no 45 issued by Deputy Director (Investigation)Bangalore and the assessee is in jurisdiction of Officers of Chennai-Search action is held to be illegal. [S. 120,132(IA), Form No 45, Art. 226]