Answers to queries on legal issues
While computing the capital gains Does subsequent registration of the documents have to adopt the higher value than the guideline value, for which the latest registration of the property executed? | |
---|---|
Subject: | While computing the capital gains Does subsequent registration of the documents have to adopt the higher value than the guideline value, for which the latest registration of the property executed? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | K.R.Ganesh |
Answered by: | Advocate Neelam Jadhav |
Tags: | Capital Gains, subsequent registration |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Since there is a gap between the date of execution of sale agreement and sale deed and if the guideline value changes, the guideline value as on the date of agreement has to be considered as the full value of the consideration of the capital gains. Since enforceable agreement was entered in the financial years… (read more)
|
Whether the assessee can claim deduction u/s 80D in respect of medical premium payment ? | |
---|---|
Subject: | Whether the assessee can claim deduction u/s 80D in respect of medical premium payment ? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Shrinivas Dixit |
Answered by: | Advocate Neelam Jadhav |
Tags: | deduction, Deduction u/s 80D, Mediclaim |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
i. The Assessee is paying Mediclaim premium for his Family as well as his parents who are senior citizens, then Assessee can claim deduction under section 80D(2)(a) for family amount restricted to Rs.25,000/- and under section 80D(2)(b) for parents amount restricted to Rs.25,000/-. ii. In this situation, the Father of the Assessee who is a… (read more)
|
Proviso to S.12A(2) is declaratory and will have and has retrospective effect [ S. 11] | |
---|---|
Subject: | Proviso to S.12A(2) is declaratory and will have and has retrospective effect [ S. 11] |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Siddharth |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | charitable trust, proviso |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Yes, An SLP numbered SLP(C) No. 011498 - 011498/2018 was filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on April 23, 2018. The same was Dismissed as withdrawn vide Order dated November 22, 2019. (read more)
|
How to compute Capital gain on sale of non-banking asset sold by a Bank ? | |
---|---|
Subject: | How to compute Capital gain on sale of non-banking asset sold by a Bank ? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | V N KULKARNI |
Answered by: | Advocate Aditya Ajgonkar |
Tags: | Capital Gains, mortgaged property |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
In this specific case, given the scant details that have been provided, the Judgement of the Third Member of the Mumbai Bench of the ITAT in the case of Perfect Thread Mills Ltd. v. DCIT [2020] 181 ITD 1 (Mum)(Trib) is relevant. The Tribunal held that the bank receives consideration from the sale of such… (read more)
|
When a firm is converted in to Limited Liability partnership (LLP) whether exemption is provided u/s 56(2)(x) of the Act .? | |
---|---|
Subject: | When a firm is converted in to Limited Liability partnership (LLP) whether exemption is provided u/s 56(2)(x) of the Act .? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Aloke Bajoria |
Answered by: | Advocate Aditya Ajgonkar |
Tags: | Conversion of firm in to LLP, Conversion of LLP, Exemption |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Section 47A(3) deals with the consequence of the provisio to Section 47(xiii) not being complied with. The said proviso to Section 47(xiii) does not impose any conditions upon the future event post conversion upon the company. Therefore a view can be taken that this merger may not come under the mischief of Section 47A as… (read more)
|
What is the Status of HUF after Karta Expires and only one coparcener wife ? | |
---|---|
Subject: | What is the Status of HUF after Karta Expires and only one coparcener wife ? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Mukund Sejpal |
Answered by: | Advocate Rahul Hakani |
Tags: | Hindu Undivided Family, HUF, Karta |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The Privy Council in Anant Bhikappa Patil v. Shankar Ramachandra Patil AIR 1943 PC 196 held that the coparcenary must be taken to continue so long as there was alive a widow of the deceased coparcener. In CIT v. Veerapa Chettiar,(1970) 76 ITR 467(SC) it is held that even after the death of the sole… (read more)
|
Charitable Trust -Faceless Assessment –Accumulation of income – Failure to consider the submission, what is the remedy .? | |
---|---|
Subject: | Charitable Trust -Faceless Assessment –Accumulation of income – Failure to consider the submission, what is the remedy .? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | A MURALIDHARAN |
Answered by: | Advocate Aditya Ajgonkar |
Tags: | accumulation of income, charitable trust, Faceless assessment |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The rectification application may need to be filed through the Income-tax Portal. The detailed process for filing of application for rectification of a mistake apparent from the record is to be found at https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/eFiling/Portal/StaticPDF/Rectification_Brochures.pdf The rectification application may be filed online. If it is not considered, the Assessee shall have the option of filing of… (read more)
|
Whether issue of Notice u/s.148 on the basis of information received from the Bank is valid ? | |
---|---|
Subject: | Whether issue of Notice u/s.148 on the basis of information received from the Bank is valid ? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | CA Pawankumar Soni |
Answered by: | Advocate Neelam Jadhav |
Tags: | presumptive basis, Reassessment, reopening of assessment |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Ans. : It seems the reason given by the Assessing Officer is correct, as the Assessee is filling Return of income under presumptive taxation i.e. u/s.44AD i.e. 8% of the total turnover. If the amount is credited in Bank which is more than the turnover the recording of reasons may be correct . If the… (read more)
|
Whether Accumulation under section 11(2) for specific object is not mentioned in form No 10 whether exemption can be denied ? | |
---|---|
Subject: | Whether Accumulation under section 11(2) for specific object is not mentioned in form No 10 whether exemption can be denied ? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Ajay Kumar jain |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | accumulation, charitable trust, form no 10 |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
As we understand, The Assessee will have the liberty to file Form 10 belatedly and be entitled to statutory benefit. it is incumbent upon concerned authority to examine admissibility of benefit than to foreclose assessee on technicalities. This has been upheld by the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain v.… (read more)
|
When the Turnover is Rs 70 lakhs whether Tax Audit required or Not? | |
---|---|
Subject: | When the Turnover is Rs 70 lakhs whether Tax Audit required or Not? |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Vishal Shah |
Answered by: | Advocate Shashi Ashok Bekal |
Tags: | Tax Audit, Turnover |
Date: | May 15, 2021 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Based on our understanding of the question, Assuming the assessee is engaged in business and not in profession. Tax Audit is applicable if total sales, turnover or gross receipt from business during the previous year exceeds Rs. 1 crore. (read more)
|