The cash payment more then Rs20000/- is not permissible under section 269SS explanation (iv) either as advance or payment for purchase of property. This provision is applicable from 01-06-2015. The contravention entails penalty under section 271D equal to the amount. This case is to be contested on facts by filing chart of withdrawal from the… (read more)

If the judgement of the jurisdictional High Court is brought to the notice of the bench and not followed it certainly is a mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under section 154 of the IT Act. (i) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MALI RAM VERMA (2003) 185 CTR (Raj) 539 : (2003) 131 TAXMAN 518… (read more)

Section 271DA reads as under: “(1) If a person receives any sum in contravention of the provisions of section 269ST, he shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of such receipt: Provided that no penalty shall be imposable if such person proves that there were good and… (read more)

The Madras High Court in C. Aryama Sundaram vs. CIT [407 ITR 1] has observed that: “The cost of new residential house would necessarily include the cost of land, materials used in the construction, labour and any other cost relatable to the acquisition or construction of the residential house” Thus GST and Stamp Duty paid… (read more)

It may be desirable to consult the Labour lawyer practicing in your area . One may consider making a police complaint explain the facts . The police may take cognisance and may file criminal case against the person responsible . One can also consider making a claim for compensation in an appropriate forum . (read more)