Answers to queries on legal issues
handle multi business balance sheet | |
---|---|
Subject: | handle multi business balance sheet |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | kollipara sundaraiah |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | ITR-3 |
Date: | June 17, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
1. The personal loan has to be disclosed in the ITR-3 Balance Sheet (Schedule BS). ITR-3 requires a complete Balance Sheet for individuals with business or professional income, including all assets and liabilities, whether personal or business-related. 2. As the two businesses are separate, you should maintain separate books of accounts (including Balance Sheet and… (read more)
|
TDS ded u/s 194H | |
---|---|
Subject: | TDS ded u/s 194H |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Anu Agarwal |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | Business expenditure, TDS U/S 194H |
Date: | June 17, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
In my view, the deduction and deposit of TDS does not absolve the company from proving the genuineness of the expenditure under Section 37(1). As the agents are untraceable, the AO may be entitled to disallow on the ground of non-business or fictitious payments. I suggest the payer-company bring on record documentation (such as agent… (read more)
|
what is the legal position of the share of a widow who is a member in an HUF in the HUF Property | |
---|---|
Subject: | what is the legal position of the share of a widow who is a member in an HUF in the HUF Property |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | sanjay saha |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | HUF |
Date: | June 16, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The widow, as a member of the HUF, has a right to maintenance from the HUF’s current assets (including the new capital infused by the eldest son). She is not a coparcener and thus has no automatic share in the HUF assets unless a partition occurs. If the erstwhile Karta distributed the HUF assets amicably… (read more)
|
section 56 (2) (X) of income tax Act case laws on reduction of stamp duty value of immovable properties post sale deed registration. | |
---|---|
Subject: | section 56 (2) (X) of income tax Act case laws on reduction of stamp duty value of immovable properties post sale deed registration. |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | S Gopinath |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | section 56(2)(x), stamp duty valuation |
Date: | June 16, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
There are a number of case laws which hold that under Section 56(2)(x), the Stamp Duty Valuation of immovable property can be challenged post-sale deed registration by claiming that it exceeds the FMV and requesting a referral to a Valuation Officer. See Dulari Devi Pala (ITAT Kolkata, 2020) and Information Technology Park Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore,… (read more)
|
healthcare in gst | |
---|---|
Subject: | healthcare in gst |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | kollipara sundaraiah |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | GST, healthcare services, manpower supply |
Date: | May 29, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The question is whether the arrangement between Hospital A and Hospital B is a supply of healthcare services or a manpower supply. In my view, Hospital A facilitates the provision of doctors who deliver exempt healthcare services to patients at Hospital B and the payments (including retention by both hospitals) are part of the healthcare… (read more)
|
UNEUQUAL ALLOCATION OF SHARES UNDER ESOP TO EMPLOYEES | |
---|---|
Subject: | UNEUQUAL ALLOCATION OF SHARES UNDER ESOP TO EMPLOYEES |
Category: | Companies Act |
Asked by: | DB |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | equity shares with differential rights, ESOP |
Date: | May 29, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
Section 43 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows companies to issue equity shares with differential rights as to voting, dividends, or other privileges. So, a company can design an ESOP policy to allocate non-voting equity shares to employees with shorter tenure or lower performance and voting equity shares to high-performing or senior employees. (read more)
|
hardship compensation under redevelopment Agreement | |
---|---|
Subject: | hardship compensation under redevelopment Agreement |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Sadanand Marathe |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | hardship compensation, redevelopment, Sarfaraz S. Furniturewalla v. Afshan Sharfali Ashok Kumar |
Date: | May 29, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
According to the judgement of the Bombay High Court in Sarfaraz S. Furniturewalla v. Afshan Sharfali Ashok Kumar, the hardship compensation is not to be considered as revenue receipt and is not liable to be tax, as a result there will be no question of deduction of TDS. from the amount payable by the Developer… (read more)
|
tds Regarding | |
---|---|
Subject: | tds Regarding |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | Santosh |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | TDS on Ocean Freight for Export |
Date: | May 29, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
If the ocean freight payment is to a Non-Resident Shipping Company, no TDS is applicable on export and import of goods. See Section 172 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and CBDT Circular No. 723 dated 19th September 1995. If the payment is made to a resident shipping company or freight forwarder, TDS is applicable… (read more)
|
Time barred for filing appeal, are we having opportunity to file before CIT(appeal) or nation face less appellate forums | |
---|---|
Subject: | Time barred for filing appeal, are we having opportunity to file before CIT(appeal) or nation face less appellate forums |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | s.ramanathan |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | appeal before first appellate authority, CIT (A) appeal, condonation of delay |
Date: | May 21, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
You can file an appeal even after the expiry of the limitation period and request for condonation of the delay. If reasonable cause for the delay is made out, the appeal will be admitted and heard on merits. (read more)
|
sale of agriculture land in cash penalty under section 269ss | |
---|---|
Subject: | sale of agriculture land in cash penalty under section 269ss |
Category: | Income-Tax |
Asked by: | CA Praveen Bansal |
Answered by: | Law Intern |
Tags: | section 269SS, Section 269ST |
Date: | May 19, 2025 |
Excerpt of answer: |
The transaction of receiving Rs. 90 lakhs in cash for the sale of agricultural land violates Section 269SS. It also violates Section 269ST. The assessee is liable for penalty under Section 271D and Section 271DA. It is arguable that only Section 269ST and Section 271DA should be considered as it is a high-value cash transactions.… (read more)
|