Answers to queries on legal issues
| Income tax doubt for notice | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Income tax doubt for notice |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | kollipara sundaraiah |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Section 131(1A) |
| Date: | November 23, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
A notice u/s 131(1A) is a pre-assessment enquiry to verify suspicion before launching a full proceeding. It is not scrutiny yet, but can lead to scrutiny/reopening if explanations are not satisfactory. The assessee has to respond promptly with proper documents and explanations through the e-filing portal. (read more)
|
| Gst 129 penalty | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Gst 129 penalty |
| Category: | GST |
| Asked by: | Saroj nagayach |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | section 129 GST |
| Date: | November 23, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
Section 129 penalty has been quashed/ reduced in cases where authorities imposed harsh fines for procedural lapses without proving intent to evade tax. In Sandip Kumar Singhal v. Deputy Commissioner WPA 321 of 2023, goods were seized from godown (not in transit). The Calcutta High Court vide judgement dated 10.03.2023 quashed penalty & held S.… (read more)
|
| Disallowance under section 43B in case of net method | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Disallowance under section 43B in case of net method |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | subodh vora |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | GST, Section 43B |
| Date: | November 23, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
The issue is not free from doubt. The better view is that the GST portion is never claimed as expense & is only a statutory liability. Therefore, there is no “amount payable” forming part of purchase/expense that remains unpaid which can be hit by 43B(h). (read more)
|
| Query on Parallel proceedings under Sec 147 and 270A | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Query on Parallel proceedings under Sec 147 and 270A |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | CA Ankit Tantia |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Section 270A |
| Date: | November 23, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
(i) Yes. If the quantum addition is deleted by CIT(A), the penalty u/s 270A automatically stand deleted. S. 270A penalty is for “under-reporting” or “misreporting” of income & is inextricably linked to the quantum addition. If it is held there is no under-reported income, there cannot be any penalty on that income. See CIT vs.… (read more)
|
| Filing of 264 petition u/s 264 | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Filing of 264 petition u/s 264 |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | CA KR.VEERAPPAN |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Revision of assessment |
| Date: | November 23, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
It appears it is not enabled. One way is to file it as a grievance under "Services > Grievance > Submit Grievance". However, it is better to mail it to the jurisdictional CIT or submit it physically. (read more)
|
| Excludability of certain assets from computation of FMV for the purpose of Sec 115TD | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Excludability of certain assets from computation of FMV for the purpose of Sec 115TD |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | A S N Murthy |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | charitable trust |
| Date: | November 21, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
It looks difficult. Surrendering 12AB will trigger Section 115TD with the specified date being the effective date of surrender. Under Section 115TD(2) read with Rule 17CB, all assets held by the trust on the specified date are included in the FMV computation, unless explicitly excluded. Legally, title was transferred to the trust via registered gift… (read more)
|
| GIFT OF LAND BY DEALER IN REAL ESTATE TO HIS FATHER | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | GIFT OF LAND BY DEALER IN REAL ESTATE TO HIS FATHER |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | Rajendra Kumar Dhandia |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Gift |
| Date: | November 21, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
U/s 45(1A), the gift of land (stock-in-trade) by a real estate dealer to his father is taxable as business income in the hands of the donor (assessee) at Fair Market Value (usually guideline/stamp duty value) minus cost of acquisition. (read more)
|
| AOP TAXATION | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | AOP TAXATION |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | Raghavendra koundinya |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Association of persons (AOP), MMR tax |
| Date: | November 21, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
U/s 167B(1), since the shares of members in the AOP's income are not determinable, the entire total income of the AOP is chargeable to tax at the MMR. If your RWA is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (or equivalent state law), s. 167B does not apply & taxation would be at individual slab… (read more)
|
| 148 notice issued for wrong deduction claimed in original return | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | 148 notice issued for wrong deduction claimed in original return |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | SUNDARARAMAN |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Reassessment |
| Date: | October 15, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
The ITO will consider the ITR filed under Section 148 for the purpose of assessment. (read more)
|
| Section 80IAC of the Income Tax Act dealing with grant of recognition for eligible business | |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Section 80IAC of the Income Tax Act dealing with grant of recognition for eligible business |
| Category: | Income-Tax |
| Asked by: | S.Thyagarajan |
| Answered by: | Law Intern |
| Tags: | Section 80-IAC |
| Date: | October 15, 2025 |
| Excerpt of answer: |
No. It is not possible to claim the deduction u/s 80-IAC without first obtaining the IMB certificate of eligible business. S. 80-IAC(3)(iii) requires the startup to hold the certificate from the IMB at the time of claiming the deduction. Also, Form 10CCB (audit report from a CA) is required to be attached. (read more)
|