Answers to queries on legal issues

If you have a query relating to any legal issue, you can use the form to ask it. We will request our expert panel to provide an answer as soon as possible. This service is for a limited period. So, please avail of it soon

Income tax doubt for notice
Subject: Income tax doubt for notice
Category: 
Asked by: kollipara sundaraiah
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 23, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
A notice u/s 131(1A) is a pre-assessment enquiry to verify suspicion before launching a full proceeding. It is not scrutiny yet, but can lead to scrutiny/reopening if explanations are not satisfactory. The assessee has to respond promptly with proper documents and explanations through the e-filing portal. (read more)
Gst 129 penalty
Subject: Gst 129 penalty
Category: 
Asked by: Saroj nagayach
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 23, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
Section 129 penalty has been quashed/ reduced in cases where authorities imposed harsh fines for procedural lapses without proving intent to evade tax. In Sandip Kumar Singhal v. Deputy Commissioner WPA 321 of 2023, goods were seized from godown (not in transit). The Calcutta High Court vide judgement dated 10.03.2023 quashed penalty & held S.… (read more)
Disallowance under section 43B in case of net method
Subject: Disallowance under section 43B in case of net method
Category: 
Asked by: subodh vora
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: November 23, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
The issue is not free from doubt. The better view is that the GST portion is never claimed as expense & is only a statutory liability. Therefore, there is no “amount payable” forming part of purchase/expense that remains unpaid which can be hit by 43B(h). (read more)
Query on Parallel proceedings under Sec 147 and 270A
Subject: Query on Parallel proceedings under Sec 147 and 270A
Category: 
Asked by: CA Ankit Tantia
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 23, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
(i) Yes. If the quantum addition is deleted by CIT(A), the penalty u/s 270A automatically stand deleted. S. 270A penalty is for “under-reporting” or “misreporting” of income & is inextricably linked to the quantum addition. If it is held there is no under-reported income, there cannot be any penalty on that income. See CIT vs.… (read more)
Filing of 264 petition u/s 264
Subject: Filing of 264 petition u/s 264
Category: 
Asked by: CA KR.VEERAPPAN
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 23, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
It appears it is not enabled. One way is to file it as a grievance under "Services > Grievance > Submit Grievance". However, it is better to mail it to the jurisdictional CIT or submit it physically. (read more)
Excludability of certain assets from computation of FMV for the purpose of Sec 115TD
Subject: Excludability of certain assets from computation of FMV for the purpose of Sec 115TD
Category: 
Asked by: A S N Murthy
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 21, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
It looks difficult. Surrendering 12AB will trigger Section 115TD with the specified date being the effective date of surrender. Under Section 115TD(2) read with Rule 17CB, all assets held by the trust on the specified date are included in the FMV computation, unless explicitly excluded. Legally, title was transferred to the trust via registered gift… (read more)
GIFT OF LAND BY DEALER IN REAL ESTATE TO HIS FATHER
Subject: GIFT OF LAND BY DEALER IN REAL ESTATE TO HIS FATHER
Category: 
Asked by: Rajendra Kumar Dhandia
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: November 21, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
U/s 45(1A), the gift of land (stock-in-trade) by a real estate dealer to his father is taxable as business income in the hands of the donor (assessee) at Fair Market Value (usually guideline/stamp duty value) minus cost of acquisition. (read more)
AOP TAXATION
Subject: AOP TAXATION
Category: 
Asked by: Raghavendra koundinya
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: November 21, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
U/s 167B(1), since the shares of members in the AOP's income are not determinable, the entire total income of the AOP is chargeable to tax at the MMR. If your RWA is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (or equivalent state law), s. 167B does not apply & taxation would be at individual slab… (read more)
148 notice issued for wrong deduction claimed in original return
Subject: 148 notice issued for wrong deduction claimed in original return
Category: 
Asked by: SUNDARARAMAN
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: October 15, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
The ITO will consider the ITR filed under Section 148 for the purpose of assessment. (read more)
Section 80IAC of the Income Tax Act dealing with grant of recognition for eligible business
Subject: Section 80IAC of the Income Tax Act dealing with grant of recognition for eligible business
Category: 
Asked by: S.Thyagarajan
Answered by:
Tags:
Date: October 15, 2025
Excerpt of answer:
No. It is not possible to claim the deduction u/s 80-IAC without first obtaining the IMB certificate of eligible business. S. 80-IAC(3)(iii) requires the startup to hold the certificate from the IMB at the time of claiming the deduction. Also, Form 10CCB (audit report from a CA) is required to be attached. (read more)