Allowing the appeal of the assessee the High Court held that amount received from sister concern in a running account were held not to constitute as an infraction under Section 269SS. Accordingly the Tribunal should have remanded matter back. High Court set aside the order of the Tribunal. Court observed that ITAT completely ignored its previous order which had the effect of restoring back to the AO the matter for the relevant AYs for fresh assessment. The judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City (2015) 379 ITR 521 (SC). (AY. 1992-93)
Asian Consolidated Industries Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 114 taxmann.com 105 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed Dy.CIT v. Asian Consolidated Industries Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 184 (SC)
S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Amount received from sister concern in a running account were held not to constitute as an infraction under Section 269SS-Tribunal should have remanded matter back-Order of penalty was set aside. [S. 254(1), 269SS]
Asian consolidated industries Ltd.
What is status of the company, I am Share holder.