Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


K. M. Refineries and Infraspace Pvt. Ltd. v, State of Maharashtra(Bom)(HC),www.itatonline.org

General Sales tax (GST)
Doctrine of promissory estoppel- New Package Scheme of incentives, 1993 – The eligibility for sales-tax exemption cannot be withdrawn under General Sales tax (GST) [ Art. 39(b) 39(c) ]

All India Federation of Tax Practitioner (AIFTP) v. UOI (Bom)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 252 : Appellate Tribunal – Departmental promotion (DPC) – Assistant registrar – The Dept is expected to follow up the proposals to fill up the posts of Assistant Registrars in such quota as well as for issuing promotions for the posts of Deputy Registrars so that all these pots to the extent possible can be filled up at the earliest .

Trilok Chand Chaudhary v. ACIT (Delhi)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 153A : Assessment – Search- Even if search happens in case of assessee, the AO cannot initiate proceedings u/s 153A if incriminating material is found during search of other person- Proceedings should be initiated u/s 153C and failure to do so renders the addition in the s. 153A assessment void-ab-initio. [ S.153C ]

Harjeet Suraprakash Girotra v. UOI (2019) 266 Taxman 29/ 311 CTR 287/180 DTR 257(Bom)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice- Mere issue of a notice is not sufficient – service of notice is essential – If the postal authorities return the notice unserved, the Dept has to serve under Rule 127(2) using one of the four sources of address (such as PAN address, Bank address etc). The failure to do so renders the reassessment proceedings invalid.[ S. 127, 147, 149, 282 Rule, 127 ]

United Investment v. ACIT (Kol)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 45: Capital loss- Long term capital gains- Long term capital loss – Set -off is allowed against taxable income .[ S.(2(14) ,2(39A)10 (38 ), 45, 70 , 71,72,74 ]

PCIT v. Binod Kumar Singh ( 2019) 178 DTR 49 / 264 Taxman 335/ 310 CTR 243 /( 2020) 423 ITR 175 (Bom)(HC),www.itatonline.org

S. 6(6) : Residence in India – Not-ordinarily resident – Cash credits -If the assessee is non –resident amount found deposited in a foreign bank is not taxable in India either u/s 68 or u/s 69 of the Act – Period of 182 days to be considered for calculating residential status of a person migrated to Foreign Country . [ S. 68, 69 ]

Peerless General Finance and investment Co. Ltd. v. CIT( 2019) 416 ITR 1/ 265 Taxman 413/ 309 CTR 321/180 DTR 97(SC), www.itatonline.org

Interpretation of taxing statutes – Precedent – Supreme Court -Pronouncement of Supreme Court is binding on High Court though not ratio decidendi of judgment .

Rajesh Enterprises v. ITO (2019) 74 ITR 12 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment-Notice not specifying the charge whether concealing particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income–Failing to strike inapplicable words- Levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 274]

Harvinder Singh v. ITO (2019) 200 TTJ 137 / 179 DTR 225 (TM)(Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Recording the satisfaction as regards concealment of particulars of income–Imposition of penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income–Levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 274]

Administrator of Estate of Lt. Edulji Framroze Dinshaw v. CIT (2019) 177 ITD 341 / 177 DTR 48 / 199 TTJ 885 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue –Interests of fixed deposits -If an amount is not chargeable to tax just because the payer has deducted the tax at source, the said amount cannot be brought to tax [S. 4].