Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. Jagdish Prasad Gupta. (2019) 414 ITR 396 / 264 Taxman 231/ 178 DTR 403 / 311 CTR 72 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment–Provision for Licence fee -Mercantile system of accounting-S.43B(1)(g) inserted with effect from 1-4-2017 will accordingly apply to assessment year 2017-18 and subsequent assessment years. [S. 43B(1)(g), 145]

PCIT v. Welspun Steel Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 252 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 43(1) : Actual cost–Subsidy-Setting up new industry- Calculation of subsidy on the basis of sales tax or excise duty- Amount of subsidy was not to be deducted from actual cost for purpose of calculating depreciation etc. [S. 4, 32]

PCIT v. Hindustan Oil Exploration Company Ltd. (2019] 264 Taxman 154 /(2020)423 ITR 465 / 187 DTR 123 / 314 CTR 518 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 42 : Business for prospecting-Mineral oil–Surrender of oil blocks before commencement of commercial production would be treated as surrender for claiming deduction of oil exploration expenditure. [S. 42(1)(a)]

PCIT v. B.T. Nagraj Reddy (2019) 264 Taxman 228 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax – Remission or cessation of trading liability -Sundry creditors shown in books of account merely on ground that assessee failed to furnish PAN or correct address of those creditors additions cannot be made.

PCIT v. Lok Advisory Services (P.) Ltd. (2019) 104 taxmann.com 67 / 264 Taxman 39 (Mag.) (Delhi) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Consultancy fee-Investment research services, paid an amount to its foreign associate entity – Allowable as business expenditure.

PCIT v. Bayer Vapi (P) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 182 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Membership fees paid to club by Chairman and Managing Director of company-Allowable as business expenditure.

PCIT v. Bayer Vapi (P) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 182 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Capital or revenue-Legal and professional expenses-Litigation expenses -Buy back of shares– Allowable as revenue expenditure.

PCIT v. Bayer Vapi (P) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 182 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation–Purchase of business on slump sale- Intangible assets and marketing rights-Depreciation is allowable- Not a related concern-Provisions of S. 40A(2)(b) of the Act cannot be applied. [S. 40A(2)]

CIT v. Ambo Agro Products (P.) Ltd. (2018) 257 Taxman 156 (Cal.) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, CIT v. Ambo Agro Products (P.) Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 167 (SC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Speculative transaction–Damages–Palm oil-Damages paid for not honouring commitments to take delivery against some purchase orders placed on foreign sellers– Allowable as business loss – Not speculative loss. [S. 43(5)]

PCIT v. GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd. (2019) 106 taxmann.com 180 / 264 Taxman 77 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd. (2019) 264 Taxman 76 (SC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-In absence of any exempt income disallowance cannot be made. [R. 8D]