Category: Allied Laws

Archive for the ‘Allied Laws’ Category


Ram Chander Talwar v. Devender Kumar Talwar (2010) 10 SCC 671/159 Comp. Cas. 646/MANU/SC/0833/2010

Banking Regulation Act,1949
S.45ZA(2): Nomination for payment of depositor’s money – Nominee rights – Bank Account – Rule of Succession – Death of Depositor- Nominee will have all the rights of the depositor, so far as the depositor’s account is concerned, however, does not make him owner of the money lying in said account – Distribution of money will depend on rules of succession governing the deceased. [Government Saving Certificates Act, 1961, S.6(1)]

Sundaram Finance Limited v. Abdul Samad 2018 (2) SCALE 467/MANU/SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
S.36: Execution of awards – Anywhere in the country – No requirement for obtaining a transfer of the decree from the Court which would have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings. [Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, S.36, 40; Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.46]

Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society v. Balwan Singh (2015) 7 SCC 373/AIR 2015 SC 2867

Advocates Act , 1961
S.33: – Bar Council of India – Counsel needs express authority to enter settlement/compromise – Admission by counsel – Client is not bound by the statement or admission. [ Bar Council of India Rules , 1975 , Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.151, Order III Rule 1, Constitution of India 1950 Art. 226, 227]

B. Santoshamma v. D. Sarala ;MANU/SC/0698/2020 (SC) www.itatonline.org

Specific Relief Act 1963.
S.12 : Specific performance of part of Contract -The onus of proof lies on the party who makes an allegation- Time is not of essence to agreements for sale of immovable property, unless the agreement specifically and expressly incorporates the consequence of cancellation of the agreement, upon failure to comply with a term within the stipulated date. [ S. 10 11 (2) 14 , Limitation Act ,1963 , S 21(1) ]

Hari Krishna Mandir Trust v. State of Maharashtra & Ors (2020) 9 SCC 356; MANU/SC/0580/2020; AIR 2020 SC 3969 (SC)); www.itatonline.org

Constitution of India,
Art. 226, High Courts bound to issue Writ of Mandamus – For enforcement of public duties – Right to property is a fundamental right and human right. [Art. 300A ]

Shailendra Swarup v. The Deputy Director, Enforcement AIR 2020 SC 3890; MANU/SC/0544/2020 (SC) www.itatonline .org Editorial: FERA, 1973 has been substituted with FEMA, 1999. Section 51 of FERA, 1973 is similar to section 13(1) of FEMA, 1999.

Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973
S. 8, Liability for Offense – Role played by in Company Affairs – Not designation or Status . [ S. 51, 68]

Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors.v.Manjit Kaur & Ors(SC)MANU/SC/0570/2020 www.itatonline.org .

Indian Registration Act , 1908

S.17 – Unregistered Document- Recording of memorandum of family Settlement prepared after the family arrangement does not require registration.

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors. www.itatonline.org (SC) : MANU/SC/0521/2020

Indian Evidence Act, 1872
S. 65B – Evidence – Electronic records- Certificate under Section 65B(4) – Not necessary if original document is itself produced. [Information Technology Act, 2000, S.3 ]

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors ( 2020) 9 SCC 1(SC) www.itatonline.org / MANU/SC/0582/2020

Hindu Succession Act, 1956
S. 6: Equal right of a daughter in HUF – Devolution of interest in coparcenary property – Confers status of coparcener on daughters, even if born prior to the amendment, with effect from 9.9. 2005 – Amendment is retrospective. [ Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 ]

Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd. v. UOI & Anr. (2006) 1 SCC 396 / AIR 2006 SC 693 / (2005) 193 ELT 257 (SC)

Central Excise Act, 1944

S.4: Excisable valuation of goods for charging of duty of excise – Assessment – Relief – Rights of an assessee – Wrong mention of section would not be ground to refuse relief to an assessee if he is otherwise entile thereto .[Central Excise tariff Act , 1985 , Rule 57A ]