Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Damodar Jajoo (2025) 482 ITR 154/173 taxmann.com 949 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, PCIT v. Damodar Jajoo (2025) 305 Taxman 10 / 482 ITR 166 (SC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Information from Investigationn Wing-Sold shares after holding same for more than seven years-Proximity of time between buy and sale of shares could not be considered as an accommodation entry-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal. [S. 10(38), 45, 68, 69,260A]

PCIT v. Damodar Jajoo (2025) 305 Taxman 10 / 482 ITR 166 (SC) Editotial : PCIT v. Damodar Jajoo (2025) 173 taxmann.com 949 /482 ITR 154 (Guj)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Information from Investigationn Wing-Sold shares after holding same for more than seven years-Proximity of time between buy and sale of shares could not be considered as an accommodation entry-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 10(38), 45, 68, 69, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Neelu Mahansaria (2025) 305 Taxman 493 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Neelu Mahansaria(2025) 175 taxmann.com 235 (Guj)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Capital gains-Exemption-Sale of shares-Report by Investigation Wing-SEBI’s detailed inquiry found no statutory violations-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition and allowing the exemption was affirmed by High Court-SLP delay of 282 days-Delay had not been satisfactorily explained by revenue-SLP dismissed on ground of delay.[S. 10(38), 45, 68, 69 Art, 136]

T.R.Balasubramanium v. ACIT (2025) 305 Taxman 119 (Mad)(HC)

S. 49 : Capital gains-Previous owner-Cost of acquisition-Immovable property upon liquidation of company in proportion to its shareholding-[S. 45,46(2), 49(iii)(c), 55(2)(b)]

PKS Holdings v. PCIT (2025) 305 Taxman 253 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. PKS Holdings (2022) 145 taxmann.com 195 (Cal)(HC)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-loss on purchase and sale of shares and securities as business loss-Controversy between assessee and revenue no longer survived in view of settlement of dues under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, SLP filed by assessee against impugned order of High Court had been rendered infructuous [Art. 136]

PCIT v. Adani Power Maharashtra Ltd. (2025) 305 Taxman 595 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mark to market loss on derivative-Swap contract loss-Hedge-Foreign exchange loss-Accrued and subsisting liability-Not merely a contingent or hypothetical liability-Allowable as deduction-Accounting Standard 11.[S. 145]

CIT v. Star Investments (P.) Ltd. (2025) 305 Taxman 437 (Mad)(HC)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Business loss-Guarantee assistance on market value basis-Pledging of shares-Loss incurred by assessee was for business expediency of group company hence such loss/debt should be treated as having been incurred for purpose of business and directly relatable to business of assessee and eligible for deduction as loss or bad debt. [S. 28(1), 36(2)]

PCIT v. Videocon Industries Ltd. (2025) 305 Taxman 561 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Videocon Industries Ltd(2025) 175 taxmann.com 239 (Bom)(HC)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Advance to subsidiary-Share application money without charging interest-Commercial expediency and in normal course of its business activities-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal-Delay of 295 days in filing SLP which had not been satisfactorily explained by revenue-SLP dismissed on ground of delay and question of law, if any, would be kept open.[Art. 136]

Mini Muthoottu Credit India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 305 Taxman 415 (SC) Editorial : Mini Muthoottu Credit India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 162 taxxmann.com 46 (Ker)(HC)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Land was used for agricultural purposes-High Court held that since there was no evidence to show that land was used for purpose of business of assessee, interest paid in respect of loan borrowed for purchasing said land could not be allowed as a deduction-SLP filed against order of High court was dismissed as withdrawn.[Art. 136]

Prime Urban Development India Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 305 Taxman 58 (Mad)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation from assessment year 1999-2000 could be set off against long term capital gains for assessment year 2002-03-Matter remanded.[S. 32(2), 72, 154, 260A]