Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ipsaa Holdings (P) LTD. v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 605 / 176 taxmann.com 823 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Issue of shares at a premium-DCF method-Addition was deleted. [S. 56(2)(vii), R.11UA]

ITO v. Somila Texfab (INDIA) (P) LTD. (2024) 237 TTJ 333 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Issues of shares at premium-The valuation of share determined by the chartered accountant at Rs. 15.23 per share was held to be correct and the addition made by the AO under s. 56(2)(viib) was deleted. [S.56(2)(viib)]

Deepak Kothari v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 241 / 177 taxmann.com 219 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Receipt of bonus shares-Provisions of s. 56(2)(vii)(c) are not attracted on receipt of bonus shares.[S.56(2)(vii)(c)]

Deepak Kothari v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 241 / 177 taxmann.com 219 (Delhi) Trib)

S.54F: Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Owing to the Death of the mother of the assessee, she received 25 per cent of the share in the property in New Delhi-Merely because the assessee had the right to receive the rent w.e.f. 11th July, 2015, the position does not change-Absolute ownership was acquired by the assessee only after mutation. The assessee is the 25 per cent owner of the property; he cannot be held to be the absolute owner of the second property-entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

Dilip Mohandas Devani v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 1098 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 54: Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Co-owners-New residential property jointly purchased by assessee and his wife-Actual contribution towards the purchase of the new house is a relevant factor while determining the eligible exemption-AO is directed to verify the proportion of investment made by the assessee and allow the exemption accordingly-Cost of improvement-The assessee has provided the best available documentary evidence in the form of contractor bills and work details, the claim for indexed cost of improvement is allowed to the assesse. [S. 45, 48]

Dilip Mohandas Devani v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 1098 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 50C: Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-The stamp duty paid on the transaction showed a higher stamp duty valuation-No request was made for referring to DVO-The CIT(A) has rightly applied the provisions of S. 50C by adopting the stamp duty value as the full value of consideration in place of the sale deed value.[S. 45]

Deepak Kothari v. ACIT (2025) 237 TTJ 241 / 177 taxmann.com 219 (Delhi) Trib)

S. 45: Capital gains-Agreement of sale-Registration-Assessee handed over the land to the buyer and also received the sale consideration in asst. yr. 2008-09-Provisions of IT Act apply on the basis of real income and not based on notional income-No provision for increasing sale consideration by notional interest.[S. 48]

Sanco Holding AS v. DCIT (IT) (2025) 237 TTJ 936 / 178 taxmann.com 673 (Dehradun) (Trib)

S. 44BB: Mineral oils-Computation-Providing its vessels for transportation to entities engaged in the exploitation/exploration of seabed or subsoil-Section 44BB was not applicable-AO is directed to compute the income of the assessee in terms of art. 21(4) of the India-Norway DTAA-DTAA-India-Norway [S.90, Art, 21]

Darshit Gunantbhai Shah v. ITO (2025) 237 TTJ 359 / 177 taxmann.com 36 ((Ahd)(Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment-Payment of TDS inadvertently misreported under cl. 26(B)(b) of From No. 3CD-the matter is restored to the jurisdictional AO with a direction to verify the correctness of the assessee’s claim and re-adjudicate the allowability of payments under S 43B in accordance with law.

Kumar Urban Development (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 881 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 41(1): Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Creditors outstanding for a long time-The amount due to the creditors is not chargeable to tax.