Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Munirajappa Ravi v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 713 (Mad)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Faceless assessment-Natural justice-Adequate opportunity of hearing must be given-Order of reassessment quashed.[S. 144, 148, Art. 226]

Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology. v.ACIT (2025) 483 ITR 696 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-No new tangible material-Reassessment not valid.[S. 148]

Mahendrakumar Chandanmal Vinayakiya v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 28 /(2025) 483 ITR 243 (Guj)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Statement of searched party-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is held to be not valid. [S. 132(4), 133(6), 148, Art. 226]

Manu Drives and Controls Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 238 (Guj)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-No fresh material-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Kamlesh Kumari v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 179(All)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Incorrect facts-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 353 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Notice-Suspicion-Notice to verify details that income has escaped assessment is not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Nathalal Ambalal and Sons v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 31 / (2025) 483 ITR 701 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 655 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Audit objection-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Shourya Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 730 / (2025) 483 ITR 528 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts –Sham transaction-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed-Sanction-Non-application of mind.[S.50C, 148,151 Art. 226]

E. Infochips Pvt. Ltd. (earlier E. Infochips Ltd.) v. ACIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 468 / (2025) 483 ITR 229 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]