Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


S208 Kanjanaickenpatty Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. v. Chief CIT (2025) 342 CTR 335 / 245 DTR 144 (Mad)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return—Condonation of delay—Genuine hardship—Audit report was made available on 9th Sept., 2019 i.e., 5 months prior to the COVID outbreak— No reasonable cause-Rejection of application is up held-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 119(2)(b), 139, 234F, Art. 226]

Nav Chetna Charitable Trust v. CIT (E) [2024] 169 taxmann.com 543/(2025) 342 CTR 121 (Bom)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Charitable trust—Accumulation of income—Belated filing of Form No. 9A—Genuine hard ship-Substantial justice-Delay is condoned. [S. 11, 119(2)(b), Form No 9A, Form No. 10,R. 17(1), Art. 226]

Lyon D.C. v.PCIT (2025) 342 CTR 359 / 245 DTR 38 / 172 taxmann.com 88 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Classic Binding Industries (2018) 257 Taxman 324 / 407 ITR 429 / 304 CTR 225/ 169 DTR 185 (SC)

S. 80IC : Special category States-Availed deduction under section 80-IC for a period of 5 years at rate of 100 per cent,-Entitled to deduction on substantial expansion for remaining 5 assessment years at rate of 25 per cent (or 30 per cent where assessee is a company)-Not at rate of 100 per cent-Review petition is dismissed on account of 412 days in filing the review petition and also on merits. [S.80IC, Art. 136]

Kamla Ajmera (Mrs.) v. PCIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 119 / (2025) 342 CTR 626 / 245 DTR 65 (Delhi) (HC)

S.54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Purchase of two independent flats in a building two different floors-Not possible to combine them as one unit-Not entitle to exemption. [S. 45]

PCIT v. Hespera Reality (P) Ltd. (2025) 342 CTR 241 / 245 DTR 1 / 303 Taxman 154 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Long term capital gains-Exemption-Book profit-Exclusion of capital gains from calculations of book profits would not disentitle it from claiming exemption under section 10(38).[S. 10(38), 115JB(2), 260A]

Kamal Mookerjee & CO. (Shipping) (P) LTD. v. CIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 419/ (2025) 342 CTR 441 (Cal)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Payment of wages to dock workers through Labour Board-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 194C, 260A, Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948]

M.P. Rajya Van Vikas Nigam Ltd. v CIT (2025) 342 CTR 8 / (2024) 244 DTR 513 (SC) Editorial : M.P. Rajya Van Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. CIT (judgment dt. 21st Oct., 2009 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court tin IT Appeal Nos. 90 of 1999 and 3 & 11 of 2001) affirmed

S.37(1): Business expenditure-No supporting material-Oder of High Court is affirmed. [Art. 136]

Oberoi Building & Investment (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 342 CTR 343 / (2024) 244 DTR 198 (Cal)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Income from house property—Income from sublicensing of property—Assessable as business income.[S. 22]

All India Central Bank Officers Federation. v. UOI (2025) 342 CTR 578 / 246 DTR 33 / 170 taxmann.com 627 (Bom)(HC)

S. 17(2) : Salary-Perquisite-Amendments made to section 17(2)(ii) by Finance Act, 2007, whereby employees allotted bank-owned accommodation were deemed to have received a concession in matter of rent respecting such accommodation, were constitutional and valid-Amendments made to section 17(2)(ii) by Finance Act, 2007 with limited retrospective effect from 1-4-2002, do not violate article 14 of Constitution or other constitutional provisions.[S.17(2)(ii), R. 3(1) Art. 14,226]

CIT (E) v. Unique Educational Society [2024] 168 taxmann.com 448 / (2025) 342 CTR 435 / 245 DTR 211 (P&H)(HC)

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Education-Providing vocational training-Eligible for registration. [S. 2(15), 12AA]