Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


S.P. Singla Construction (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 559 / 245 DTR 357 (Chd)(Trib)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sub-contractors-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment order is quashed. [S.148]

Sitac Re (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 971/ 174 taxmann.com 428 ((Delhi)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-limited scrutiny-Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-The addition made under s. 41(1) and disallowance of transmission charges are deleted.[S. 41(1)]

Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (IT) [2024] 168 taxmann.com 269 / (2025) 233 TTJ 83 (Mum)(Trib)

115JB : Company-Book profit-Income from operation of ships-Income offered income under deeming provision-Provsion of book profit is not applicable-DTAA-India Hing Kong. [S. 44B, 90(2), Art. 8]

Akshay Nitin Malu v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 491 / 245 DTR 353 / 173 taxmann.com 684 (Pune)(Trib)

S.115BAC:Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family-Option-Form No 10E-New regime and old regime-The assessee cannot be forced to adopt the new regime-The action of the CPC in processing the return of income determining the total income under the new regime of taxation is quashed and set aside.[S. 139, Form No.10E]

Biocon Biologicals Ltd v. ACIT (2025)233 TTJ 930 / 170 taxmann.com 372 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Interest on outstanding receivables from AES-Outstanding dues beyond an agreed credit period are separate international transaction, which requires to be benchmarked separately and cannot be clubbed together with other transactions-Working capital adjustment subsumed accrued interest on trade receivables, and no separate adjustment should be made was not advanced before the TPO or the DRP-, Issue is restored back to the TPO.[R. 10A]

Pushpadevi Shivlal Rathi v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 12 / 245 DTR 16 (SMC) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Income Declaration Scheme, 2016-quoted wrong PAN No.-issue is restored to the AO for necessary verification. [Income Declaration Scheme, 2016]

Asha Daga v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 860/ 170 taxmann.com 199 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Jewellley-Banl locker-Old jewellery was converted in to bullion-Addition is justified. [S. 132, 153A]

Bhupatbhai Thakarshibhai Mavani v. ACIT (2025) 233 TTJ 29 (UO) (Surat) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Repayment of loan-Addition is deleted-Loan outstanding-Report of the Inspector is not provided to the assessee-Violation of principle of natural justice-The matter is restored to the AO to provide the report of the Inspector to the assessee for his rebuttal with proper and supporting evidences.[S. 133(6)]

Sopan Bandoba Chavan v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 17 (UO) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Survey-Disclosure of additional income as business income-Surrendered income cannot be assesses as cash credit and invoking the provision of section 115BBE of the Act. [S. 115BBE, 133A]

SPL Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 169 taxmann.com 459/ (2025) 233 TTJ 495 / 245 DTR 321 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Issue of shares at premium-Merchant banker on the basis of DCF method-No valuation by DCF method at the time of issuance of shares-Valuation report was obtained in the course of assessment proceedings-The AO is justified in determining the fair market value of shares by applying R. 11UA(2) and making addition by invoking section 56(2)(vib) of the Act. [S. 56(2)(vib), R.11UA(2)]