Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


British Agro Products (India) Pvt. Ltd v. PCCIT (2025) 482 ITR 705 (Mad)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Recovery of tax Stay of demand-Application for stay of demand-Petition for stay of demand before assessing authority pending–Direction to dispose of appeal within four months from date of order [S. 220(6), Art. 226]

Shyam Oil Extractions Pvt. Ltd v. PCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 555 / (2025) 482 ITR 430 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-High-pitched assessment-Pre-deposit of 20 per cent. of assessed tax-Discretion to waive pre-deposit, Effect of CBDT circular. Circular cannot override powers of appellate authority-Commissioner considering facts and rejecting application but granting facility of paying tax in instalments-Circular cannot override powers of appellate authorities-CBDT Instruction No. 96, dated 21-8-1969-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 119,220(6), 246, Art. 226]

P.S. Subramanian. v. ITO [2024] 160 taxmann.com 232 / (2025) 482 ITR 29(Mad)(HC)

S. 159 : Legal representatives-Death of assessee-Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals)-Appeal against order passed while assessee alive-Proper procedure to be followed-Existence of alternative remedy-Appeal against assessment order-Defect in filing appeal-Not entitled to invoke writ jurisdiction against assessment order-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 143(3), 221(1), 246A, Art. 226]

Mange Ram Mittal v. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 306 /(2025) 482 ITR 130 (P&H)(HC) Editorial :SLP dismissed, Mange Ram Mittal v. CIT (2025) 481 ITR 12 / 307 Taxman 613 (SC

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed income-Benami companies-High Court holding findings of fact if not perverse cannot be interfered with in appeal-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 132, 158BB, 260A]

Vijay Sehgal v. PCIT (2025) 482 ITR 331 (P & H) (HC)

S. 158BB : Block assessment-Computation-Undisclosed income-Particular income did not fall within the period of block assessment-Amount not assessable. [S. 260A]

ITO v. Forever Bodycare Industries.(2025) 482 ITR 285/ 173 taxmann.com 912 (SC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-No incriminating material-Satisfaction notes had not recorded any reasons-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay and also on merits. [Art. 136]

PCIT v. Kaushik Devjibhai Patel (2025) 482 ITR 808 (Guj)(HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-No incriminating material found during search-Completed assessment cannot be interfered with.[S.260A]

Bloom Energy (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 474 / (2025) 482 ITR 930 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153: Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Order giving effect to the order of Tribunal-Transfer Pricing-Raising demand Order raising demand contrary to order of Tribunal-Order set aside.[S. 92CA, 153(3), 156, 254(1), Art. 226]

Praveen Kumar Bhardwaj v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 855 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order passed without considering reply of assessee-Not valid.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Sunil Kumar Jain Shrishrimal v. CCIT (2025) 482 ITR 847 (Chhattisgarh) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order passed without giving assessee opportunity to be heard-Not valid.[S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]