Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search & seizure-Addition based solely on employee’s diary and retracted statements-Not sustainable. (S. 132, 132(4A) 153A)

Jamna Dass Nikkamal Jain Saraf (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 473 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Seized Papers-Where seized rough sheets substantially tally with the regular books of account, only unexplained differences can be sustained and not the entire addition. [S.132, 145(3)]

DCIT v. Santosh Trust (2025) 238 TTJ 237 / 178 taxmann.com 31 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Cash deposits during demonetisation-Addition was deleted where source stood explained from regular books [S. 115BBE]

Suresh Kumar Banthia v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 130 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Survey-Addition based on dumb documents seized from third parties deleted.[S. 133A]

ACIT v. Chhattisgarh Distilleries Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 774 / 177 taxmann.com 257 (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Undisclosed Income-Loose papers-Addition based on dumb documents-Addition was deleted.[S.69C, 132, 153A]

Rajnish Kasturchand Ostwal v. ITO (IT) (2025) 238 TTJ 737 / (2026) 216 ITD 24 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Non-Resident Indian-Investment in property out of foreign salary remitted through NRE account cannot be assessed under section 69. [S. 5(2)]

Ayesha Steels (P) Ltd v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 942 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Cash deposit in bank-Demonetisation-Cash sales-Books of account not rejected-Figures of sales have been depicted in VAT return-Addition is deleted-Section 115BBE is applicable to transactions on or after 1st April, 2017.[S. 115BBE]

Sharad Maheshwari v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 1055 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 68: Cash credits-Gift from sister-Creditworthiness and genuineness proved-Addition deleted.

Ashok Panwar (HUF) v. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 681 (Jodhpur)(Trib.) Ashok Panwar. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 681 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S.68: Cash credits-Bogus long-term capital gains-Genuine share transactions through stock exchange, demat account and banking channels cannot be treated as bogus in the absence of incriminating evidence. [S. 45 69C]

Samrat Finvestors (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 423 / 181 taxmann.com 713 (Kol.)(Trib.).

S. 68: Cash credits-Addition cannot be sustained where the assessee establishes the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share subscribers by producing confirmations, ITRs, audited financial statements, bank statements and all subscribers respond to notices under section 133(6).[S. 131, 133(6)]