Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. v. Directorate of Enforcement, Govt. of India [2023] 148 taxmann.com 399 (Bom)(HC)

Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
S. 5 : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002-Attachment of property-Rights of secured creditor-Pending decision on validity of provisional attachment, interim arrangement was necessary to avoid wastage or encroachment. Sale proceeds were safeguarded with Court. [S.8]

Reliance Communication Ltd. v. Rajendra P. Bansal [2023] 146 taxmann.com 156 / 177 SCL 68 / 237 Comp Case 30 (Bom)(HC)

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
S. 14 : Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process-Moratorium-Jurisdiction of NCLT-NCLT cannot exercise jurisdiction over every issue concerning corporate debtor simply because corporate debtor is in insolvency, it is only those issues which arise solely out of insolvency of corporate debtor that can be adjudicated upon by NCLT under section 60(5)(c) [S. 60(5), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.60]

SVSVS Projects Pvt. Ltd v. State of Telangana and Another(2025) 474 ITR 306 /172 taxmann.com 14 (Telangana) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, ITO v. SVSVS Projects (P.) Ltd (2025) 304 Taxman 271 / 474 ITR 312 (SC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Delay was due to crisis in company-No mala fide intention of evasion on part-Prosecution after a lapse of more than three years quashed. [S.133A]

ITO v. SVSVS Projects Pvt. Ltd. and others (2025) 474 ITR 312 /304 Taxman 271 (SC) Editorial : SVSVS Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Others v State of Telangana and Another(2025) 474 ITR 306 /172 taxmann.com 14 (Telangana) (HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Delay was due to crisis in company-No mala fide intention-Prosecution after a lapse of more than three years High Court quashing-Delay of 239 days-SLP dismissed on Supreme Court Special leave petition dismissed on ground of delay. [Art. 136]

CIT v. Vamshi Chemicals Ltd [2024] 162 taxmann.com 906 / (2025) 474 ITR 422 (Cal)(HC)

S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Share application money-Not a loan or deposit-Penalty under section 271D/271E deleted..[S. 269SS, 269T, 271E]

CIT v. Jindal Tractebel Power Co. Ltd., (2025) 474 ITR 477 (Karn) (HC)

S. 271C : Penalty-Failure to deduct TDS-Reasonable cause-Reliance on professional/legal opinions-Penalty deleted.[S. 201(1), 201(1A), 260A, 273B]

Orkay Enterprises v. Dy. CIT, (2025) 474 ITR 503 (Bom) (HC)

S. 271B : Penalty-Failure to get accounts audited-Delay explained by searches/seizures-Quality of cause shown more important than length of delay. [S. 44AB, 132.]

PCIT v. Jehangir H. C. Jehangir [2023] 155 taxmann.com 209 (Bom)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Defective notice-Not specifying the charge-Concealment of income-Inaccurate particulars of income-Non-application of mind-Order of Tribunal quashing the penalty was affirmed.[S. 260A, 274]

Mettupalayam Ramamoorthi Rathindran v. PCIT (2025) 474 ITR 120 (Mad)(HC)

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Long term capital gains-Objections of the assessee was not considered-Order was quashed and set aside-Matter remanded. [S. 45, 48, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Universal Music India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 155 taxmann.com 230 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed on account of delay of 411 days and also on merits, PCIT v. Universal Music India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 295 Taxman 232 (SC).

S. 263 : Revision-New issue not in notice-Commissioner cannot revise on ground not raised in notice. [S. 40A(2)(b), 143(3), 260A]